NICK Cole tells us that in any negotiation there are two sides to the debate and that somehow my expression of “frustration” over the lack of progress strengthens the Unionists (Letters, Oct 24).
Well, isn’t the salient point that there is no “negotiation” taking place and through the framing of the Scotland Act and overt control of media output there is no imperative for there ever to be?
And doesn’t it really not matter how many in Scotland clamour in the opinion polls for indy, as without direct action to create the constitutional crisis to change the imperative, there likely never will be?
READ MORE: Indy plans will fail if the Yes movement doesn’t work together as one
Weren’t we told, when it seemed unlikely, that we needed a majority of Scottish indy-supporting MPs to achieve independence? So why aren’t we using this supermajority of indy-supporting MPs now to demand it?
Shouldn’t we be highlighting to the public in every policy area where being a “partner” in this iniquitous Union puts us at a disadvantage so the public can see clearly how indy will benefit them?
Prime Minister’s Questions is a window to the world. Isn’t that where we should be making demands for Scotland’s fundamental democratic rights to be respected? And if no adequate answer is forthcoming, shouldn’t our indy-supporting MPs withdraw from the Chamber and from participation in this shambolic charade of alleged democracy?
Let’s add to the confusion by voting on a motion in Holyrood to renounce the unscrupulously enacted Treaty of Union and unilaterally repeal the Act of Union 1707. The stooshie that would create would bring the issue to the attention of everyone and galvanise action.
READ MORE: Leading bankers say Scottish bond plan will boost nation's profile
I just don’t see how demanding real action over indy plays into the hands of Unionists. It should serve as a warning that anger is mounting for action now.
We mustn’t allow the Unionists to sit back in comfort holding the aces. We have to give them the problem that only the plebiscite can begin to resolve for them.
Only when that’s achieved will those we need to take with us even begin to address the issues they’re confronted with and, as with opinion polls progression in 2014, see the rise in support that will bring the respectable victory we need to enable us to build a better Scotland away from the usurers of Westminster.
And wouldn’t it help if those like Nick Cole joined the clamour for real action now rather than claiming a division that neither exists or is relevant to the wider cause of Scotland’s intrinsic right to self-determination?
Jim Taylor
Edinburgh
ANAS Sarwar likes to blandly parrot the phrase that “Scotland is being failed by both governments” yet does not explain how the Scottish Government (whether SNP or Labour) could have succeeded when the UK Government was failing, economically and democratically. Of course, it is easy to haughtily criticise others but while popular soundbites come easily, fundamental change does not.
The truth (which Mr Sarwar refuses to honestly admit) is that as long as it is bound to the Union, Scotland cannot even begin to significantly prosper while the UK economy is broken, austerity continues to effectively starve public services of much-needed cash, and there is a lack of substantial funds available (evidenced by “Northern Leg” cancellation of HS2) to invest in Scotland’s infrastructure that has been neglected for decades.
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar at odds with Keir Starmer on House of Lords reform
According to Mr Sarwar’s boss, Sir Keir, it will take 10 years to turn the economy around and for the UK, and perhaps Scotland, to benefit from sustained financial growth, but any serious social and democratic gains would take much longer to emerge.
In other words, the “Big Labour Plan” would essentially ensure more of the same for Scotland over the next 10 years, especially if there is not a strong SNP voice at Westminster pushing for more progressive policies. The only route to achieving real change and for Scotland to secure its true potential as a prosperous, fair and egalitarian country, is for Scotland to determine its own future as an independent nation again.
Perhaps, as Labour at Westminster have joined with the Tories in effectively abandoning the historic inhabitants of Palestine, more Labour supporters, activists, and possibly even a few principled MSPs will wake up and realise that their aspirations, for Scotland and its people, cannot be attained within the current failing constitutional arrangements.
Stan Grodynski
Longniddry, East Lothian
SARWAR condemns others for refusing to follow orders which are clearly immoral (Sarwar attacks Labour figures who quit over Gaza ‘gag order’, Oct 25). The Nuremberg defence does not absolve you of being guilty in acts of war crimes whether by deed or act. The state of Israel has ignored UN resolutions for years and continues to wipe the Palestinians from the face of the Earth. Shame on the USA, the UK and others who stand in support of this policy.
William Cargill
via thenational.scot
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel