PRIME Minister Liz Truss has defended Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng's champagne party with financiers who may have profited from the financial crash in the hours after he announced the government's disastrous mini-budget.
Kwarteng has faced calls for an inquiry after it emerged that he attended a bash with hedge fund managers who would make financial gains from the crash of the pound.
According to The Times, the financiers egged the Chancellor on to push through with the plans despite the growing panic over the state of the economy during the bash on Friday September 23.
READ MORE: Liz Truss blames communication issues for economic panic
At the home of Andrew Law, a financier and Tory party donor, Kwarteng reportedly gave guests an insight into forthcoming government spending cuts, something PM Truss remained tight-lipped on during an appearance on the BBC on Sunday morning.
Law is worth an estimated £750 million, has donated £3.6 million to the Tories since 2004, and admitted to taking a short position on the pound in recent years.
The reports have raised concerns that the event informed Kwarteng's decision to push ahead with further cuts despite the market's panicked reaction to his plans.
The pound collapsed to its lowest level since 1985 following the announcement, with the fall-out growing as the week went on, leading to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) calling for a row-back on the cuts and the Bank of England (BoE) staging an emergency intervention to stop pension pots from collapsing.
The Times reports that Kwarteng has been dubbed a "useful idiot" by two prominent hedge fund bosses, with the phrase allegedly in widespread circulation in the City.
Confronted with the claims on the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme, Truss defended her Chancellor's actions.
The Prime Minister said: “The Chancellor meets business people all the time, that’s his job.
“I do not manage Kwasi Kwarteng’s diary, believe me.”
READ MORE: BBC feed cuts out as Laura Kuenssberg interviews Liz Truss
Pressed on whether it would have been better if he had not gone as people are struggling with the cost-of-living crisis, Truss said: “I get up every morning as Prime Minister thinking how can we make our country more successful, how can we reassure people, how can we help people get through these very difficult times and we do face difficult times…
“And that’s what I’m focused on. That’s what the Chancellor is focused on and that is what the whole Cabinet is focused on.”
There were around 30 guests at the swanky west London bash including stockbroker Howard Shore, Swiss-born London banker Sir Henry Angnest, corporate-financier Lord Leigh of Hurley, merchant banker Selva Pankaj, and Tory party chairman Jake Berry.
It comes as opposition politicians have called for an inquiry to establish whether or not Kwarteng's partying with hedge fund managers constitutes a breach of the ministerial code.
As the event was a party, officials would not be required to disclose the event on ministerial transparency returns.
Deputy Labour leader Angela Rayner said on Twitter: "This is alarming behaviour. The Chancellor faces incredibly serious questions about his conduct.
"These claims now need to be thoroughly investigated to determine if the Ministerial Code has been broken."
READ MORE: Scots gather in Edinburgh for AUOB march for independence
Liberal Democrat Treasury spokeswoman Sarah Olney said: “While struggling homeowners saw their mortgage bills spiral, it seems the Chancellor was sipping champagne with hedge fund managers profiting from the falling pound.
“How out of touch can you get? We need an official inquiry into this now.”
A source close to the Chancellor told The Times: “Any suggestion attendees had access to privileged information is total nonsense.
"The Growth Plan [published earlier that day] included a commitment to review our tax code to make it simpler, better for families and more pro-growth. The government’s ambitions on lowering the tax burden are hardly a state secret.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel