IT saddens me intensely that Scotland is unable to counteract the problem of severe UK propaganda resulting from mainstream media (MSM) due to misleading or even absent appropriate coverage. MSM in the UK is abhorrent but highly successful, and one has to admit they are good at it. It results in a severe battle for Scotland in our fight for independence.
It is so good to have The National as effectively the only paper fighting from Scotland’s arena in a never-ending, one-sided lengthy and difficult conflict which has the danger of sickening the average voter. I know how damaging that can be.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf rejects claims he misled Holyrood over Covid WhatsApps
I was born in Uganda and schooled in Kenya during the dreaded Mau Mau uprising. In my formative years I learnt and absorbed the atrocities. Listening on my crystal set in
the dormitory under the blankets to news programmes from different nations – but principally at that time, Voice of America – I knew that my trusty school-issue pick axe helve (given to all pupils) was under my bed in case the Mau Mau invaded the dormitory!
At that time the colonial authorities fought the Kenyans with gulags. I think there were at least three in Kenya, where the authorities created their own atrocities against those inmates conveniently hidden and isolated from the world, tortured, starved or shot and killed. And what now? No apologies on behalf of the colonial authorities that I have heard – not even from a recent three-day royal visit with its complacent speeches politely listened to by the Kenyan officials on parade during the well-turned-out and disciplined Kenyan forces in attendance. They were astoundingly smart.
READ MORE: Pro-Palestinian protesters arrested after scaling Scottish Parliament
So, in Monday’s edition of The National, correspondence from Bruce Moglia setting out the ins and outs of Scotland’s legal position, covering international law as being entirely different to UK domestic law, raised my heart. A letter that had at last some forthright, simple, distinct meaning surely acceptable to those discerning Scottish politicians, readers, the wavering future voters that I would sincerely hope has some useful meaning for your paper’s readership. But will the mainstream media cover that? Not on your nelly!
Importantly, Bruce also brings into play the input resulting from Salvo suggesting any Scots that have a genuine desire for independence should go to salvo.scot for some intriguing input. I did a long time ago and isolated my mind from all the MSM crap that exists out in the UK. That way, I sleep better at night.
There remains one worry for me, as a late octogenarian. It is that positive arguments for independence at long last result in the long overdue break-up of the UK, so that each nation can go their own way like so many other countries worldwide, but I will not live to see it. It must happen sooner or later. As a nation, Scotland must take part properly worldwide and not be held back. It must go its own way successfully for the benefit of its up-and-coming younger generation.
WD Mill Irving
Kilbirnie
I HAVE believed in Scottish independence since I first read about the aims of the SNP in 1965, when the SNP rated one paragraph in a book about the 1964 General Election.
Things have changed a lot since then, and things will improve after the initial disruptions caused by independence. In this increasingly chaotic world the last thing we need is to remain tied to is a Westminster government that might have to dance to Trump’s tune and which is as anti-democratic and self-centred as that demagogue.
David Black
via thenational.scot
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel