WHILE I can agree with Steve Arnott (Letters, Jan 7) that the matter of rejoining the EU should be a separate matter for after regaining independence, which should be our single focus right now, doesn’t the main thrust of his anti-EU viewpoint seem straight out of the Brexit campaign group’s propaganda machine?
Whilst Brexiteers have always relied on such spoon-fed nonsense, what interests me is the real personal view that invariably seems to be obscured by it – usually anything from personal financial circumstances through to outright xenophobia and worse.
I agree the EU is not a perfect organisation. By its nature it is a group of nations working together to create a level playing field and standards for all to work with equally. As such it operates across the board to staunch the wilder excesses of capitalism while affording a higher level of workers’ rights and protections – indisputable given how the British government only recently has declared its intent to reduce the right of workers to withdraw their labour.
READ MORE: Securing independence is the first step – EU discussions come later
Claiming the EU is not democratic is to entirely misunderstand the nature of the organisation; it being a group of nations, each allegedly “democratically” accountable, rather than a nation state in its own right (we should be more concerned about the anti-democratic British government currently denying Scots their fundamental democratic right to decide their independent nation status).
Of course the EU could be reformed to the US model, with direct federal government elections and local state government, which would resolve any democratic concerns of the anti-EU lobby(?); but wouldn’t they be the first to complain about that too, claiming loss of sovereignty was a price too high to pay?
For me, the EU membership argument – out or in – has been simplified by Brexit. We are now living with the direct consequences of being out: loss of inward investment, poorer trading deals, exporting trading difficulties, food shortages, labour shortages, travel more difficult, government-induced reduction of our living standards and rights, restricted education opportunities and the increased cost implications of all of these and more manifested by higher prices fuelling a crippling inflation rate and slashing the living standards of all of us – all while the British rich get richer and the rest of us poorer.
READ MORE: Putting the EU question on the back-burner could cost us independence
The EU had a calming effect on the wilder excesses and incompetence of British government. Now unfettered, the catastrophic return of the economic “British disease” of 50s to 70s Britain has returned for us all see and suffer first-hand. After 13 years of austerity, the necessary and predicted reset of pay levels in response to rampant inflation and higher costs of everything from food to housing is being resisted by the very hapless government that caused the problem in the first place; we’ve been taken back to the industrial strife of yesteryear, only this time even those key public-service workers who have traditionally agreed not to strike are now being forced to by draconian government intransigence. Sadly Labour’s alternative is more of the same.
Scotland’s model should not be those countries like Norway – which has thrived by squirrelling away its oil revenues (at consumers’ cost) – but rather Ireland, which has benefitted from enthusiastic membership and built a modern economy on our doorstep exporting throughout Europe from what was basically an agrarian economy selling most of its produce to Britain.
It is telling that Ireland is not clamouring to leave the EU. No-one is. Brexit demonstrated the failure of British economic and social mentality, not Europe’s.
However, indy first, and then let’s have the full debate based on facts and national interests, not personal preference.
Jim Taylor
Edinburgh
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel