GRASSROOTS government is not about big issues – such as lockdown, new hospitals, or motorways etc – it’s more about local issues such a cycle lanes, libraries, community centres, fixing potholes, nursery provision and more – all issues that could or should concern people greatly. The problem at the moment is with Scotland’s councils being so big and not raising their own funds.

Scotland is the least “local” in Europe – with 32 councils with an average size of 2,500 square metres – which compares to the EU average of 38 square metres! Norway has 422 councils and 11 regions.

READ MORE: Brexit-backing Yes party relaunches for council election race

People feel disconnected and disengaged over local decision-making. In fact councils are not really local at all. I feel certain people from all political persuasions support greater local representation. The point is that shifts in opinions, petitions or marching for change or reform should and do begin at the grassroots – with stalls, pamphlets, meetings etc.

The turnout for local council elections is very low because many feel disenfranchised and ignored.

My view is that if we can improve local government and make it feel more “local” – we may make people feel more empowered and more likely to feel independent and vote for independence! And make it really local!

P Keightley
Glasgow

WE now know for certain there will be a fair few new councillors after the May elections. I wonder how many of them have been vocal on issues of real local concern in the recent past? I also ponder on how few of us are really aware that there are more constraints on what councillors can say in support of their constituents than on MPs and MSPs?

This is particularly so in matters that become planning issues. I don’t know when these restraints first became the norm. However, it is my understanding that opinions/comments by councillors or by individuals who become councillors about potential projects in advance of any planning application have been deemed to pre-judge a subsequent planning application and resulted in them being excluded from voting and defending their constituents’ interests.

READ MORE: 'No independence referendum bill in Holyrood before local elections'

Surely this is an afront to democracy and the ability of councillors to represent their communities?

Something else I have just been made aware of, since first voting 50-odd years ago. A non-party candidate can only describe themselves as “independent” or leave the description blank. This applies to local, Scottish and Westminster elections. I know that mainly in the past, but still persisting in some places, “independents” were generally Tories who don’t take the whip. However, there can arise situations that call for highlighting specific issues that the main parties persistently ignore. Does that mean having to go through the rigmarole of forming a “political party” just to highlight an issue, and differentiate that candidate from another “independent” who is a closet Tory?

Being able to add a few words that qualify “how” independent that person is could make a difference. What if last year a former MSP could have been labelled as “independent – land reformer”. Just a thought.

Willie Oswald
Blanefield

GORDON MacIntyre-Kemp’s article in Saturday’s paper raises some interesting questions for the independence movement as a whole and the SNP in particular (Only one issue with dominate Scottish council elections – independence, Apr 2).

I don’t think the SNP will campaign for the councils on independence, as in recent years they’ve campaigned on just about everything BUT independence. The focus on independence will come from Unionists, NOT the SNP, who in all likelihood will try to stay clear of the subject.

I believe the 2017 scenario is likely to happen in the council elections this year and that, although unsaid, this is favoured by the high heidyins of the SNP. It gives them another excuse to do nothing to bring about the much promised referendum (next year, next decade, next millennium?)

READ MORE: Scottish Green councillor calls for better deal for local representatives

No doubt the Ukraine crisis and refugees will give rise to a further kick into the long grass of any work on independence.

It’s time that grass was cut.

I accept that the SNP in parliament are a necessary vehicle for the independence movement, but their reluctance to move on independence becomes more frustrating as time passes with little action taking place.

Is this deliberate, to dishearten the movement for independence so that it withers through inaction and repeats 2017? It’s beginning to seem so.

Drew Reid
Falkirk

IN The Sunday National report on the AUOB march in Arbroath, following the words of Michael Russell, it brought a distinct air of hope to read: “Other speakers included Eva Comrie, of the Alba Party, who also issued a plea for unity...”

In all our decades of search to secure Scotland’s independence from London rule, the greatest error to my mind was Nicola Sturgeon’s casual rejection of Alex Salmond’s proposal in late March 2021. The icing on the cake to set us on the road toward a successful campaign will be when Ms Sturgeon concedes to an error of judgement and makes a similar call for unity to that of Ms Comrie.

Tom Gray
Braco

GREAT to read an article by Neal Ascherson in The National (A time when Britain welcomed those fleeing for their lives, Apr 4). He is a formidable thinker, journalist and writer. Although he is approaching 90, it would be good to see more articles from him if he is willing.

As someone who has appreciated his writing over many years, I wish him well whatever he decides to do.

Richard Walthew
Duns