THE whole country is used to Boris Johnson pulling a stunt to distract attention when he is faced with yet another self-inflicted catastrophe.
The latest ploy by Johnson, the attack on the BBC, has rather a sinister undercurrent. When the government defunded the BBC World Radio Service, which was Britain’s strongest soft power influence globally, who benefitted most? Vladimir Putin. The BBC World Service Russian output was cut, and a vital counter to the Russian propaganda output was gone.
The BBC is a massive asset in disseminating British influence globally. It is hugely respected for its objective reporting and is used by communities across the world, unable to rely on the news coverage in their own country.
READ MORE: Angus Robertson hits back at Nadine Dorries over BBC threat
Crippling and undermining the BBC is therefore in Russia’s interest. Fascinatingly the Tory Party have been recorded to receive millions in donations from Russian oligarchs, some with strong links to Vladimir Putin….
Boris Johnson’s refusal to release the report on the extent of Russian influence meant it took years and a huge effort by campaigners to get it released. Even then it was edited or redacted. The extent to which Russian influence permeates the Tory Party is still unclear.
When Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries first entered parliament she criticised old Etonian David Cameron as a posh boy who did not know the cost of a pint of milk. Now, appointed by another old Etonian, Johnson – similarly disconnected and out of touch – she is using her position to push crude attempts at media censorship, to stem the widespread criticism of the government’s deep-seated incompetence and sleaze.
Much is made of her writing credentials, yet most of her book sales are just e-books. Many have been described as being of the “clogs and shawl” genre. Reviews in the Irish Times complain of lazy Irish stereotypes in her books and quoted a noted author as saying “Calling Nadine Dorries an author is like saying cannibal Jeffrey Dahmer was a chef.”
READ MORE: 'Does nobody want this job?': Reporters back away from BBC political editor role
Her use of social media to attack detractors led one Daily Telegraph writer to remark: “It makes it hard for us to respect parliamentarians in general. They should be like us, of course, but at our best. She comes out of this looking very thin-skinned and at best eccentric”.
Nadine Dorries’s attack on the BBC does appear ill-judged. Members of the Cabinet have complained that they were not consulted. Vastly experienced Tory MP Peter Bottomley was “not impressed” by the announcement. He asked why the BBC licence was the one thing that could not be increased because of the cost-of-living hikes.
No sign of the government requiring energy companies to freeze their price increases!
Both Boris Johnson and Nadine Dorries show just how thin-skinned and inexperienced they are, Johnson throwing out meaningless soundbites and Dorries naively attempting to justify her boss’s ploys. They cannot cope with the routine rough and tumble of national politics. The old but very appropriate saying “If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen!” applies.
What happened to the integrity that Nadine Dorries showed in criticising just how out of touch the old Etonians are? The woman who described them as “arrogant posh boys who show no remorse, no contrition, and no passion to understand the lives of others.”
Andrew Milroy
Trowbridge
DON’T give the Britnat BBC any money. Why pay for anti-Scottish propaganda? Presumably Angus Robertson is happy to do so.
Bernard Stewart
via thenational.scot
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel