RUTH Davidson and Jackie Baillie reached new depths while scraping the bottom of their barrels on Wednesday while attacking the Scottish Government over the findings in the Auditor General’s report in respect of the pandemic.
How many governments throughout the world had contingency plans ready for a Covid-19 pandemic?
While the autocratic governments in China and North Korea took immediate action and several other geographically isolated countries – including South Korea, Australia and New Zealand – closed their borders very quickly, most other countries had to start from a similar position to that of Scotland.
READ MORE: Kirsty Strickland: Planning for the future just now is fruitless ... as is fixating on the past
It is likely that in dealing with the pandemic Scotland suffered more from its inability to act before permitted by Westminster legislation and lack of borrowing powers than it did from the few critical points raised in the Auditor General’s report, which was much more positive than the opposition leaders.
John Jamieson
South Queensferry
RUTH Davidson and Jackie Baillie spent First Minister’s Question Time accusing the FM of failing to prepare for the Covid-19 pandemic. I’m sure they thought they had a winner in quoting from the Sygnis and other projects. The resulting papers detailing the problems and actions were published for anyone to read and no doubt were circulated to the political parties at the time, therefore available to Davidson and Baillie several years ago.
Many people claim to be clever in hindsight (and taking words that suit them out of a newly published report intended as lessons for the future) but parliamentarians of all parties are there to do what is best for the public. So, is there evidence that Labour or Tory MSPs made any reference, before Thursday, to these reports since their publication years ago?
I have no doubt that Scottish Tory MPs will be taking Boris Johnson to task over the same issues. The whole of Scotland will be watching.
Mike Underwood
Linlithgow
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel