I HAVE often heard it said that you can tell a lot about a person by looking at their friends.
What exactly does that say about President Donald Trump when you consider that he speaks fondly about such despots as Kim Jong Un, Mohammad Bin Salman and Vladimir Putin? There is also his support of a great many white supremacists.
Then there is his support of the National Rifle Association and their rabid right-wing membership who do not consider that the many thousands of victims of mass killings reason enough to at least restrict access to military grade automatic weapons.
I sincerely hope that Trump’s endorsement of Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage is seen as further evidence that his judgment is, at best, suspect or at worst, evidence of a deranged mind.
Harry Key
Largoward
SO President Trump has endorsed Boris. What happened to not interfering in another country’s affairs? What would the American reaction be if a British politician publicly endorsed an American politician?
David Ritchie
North Ayrshire
IT does not surprise me that the BBC is apparently blanking complaints from the SNP about coverage (BBC accused of
‘bunker mode’ on SNP complaints, June 1). Over many years I have written letters to the BBC varying from pleas to improve honesty,
to complaints about specific manipulation of events, to ones
of outright sarcasm. It seems I am now blackballed, as later letters were ignored.
It is a difficult problem for the
SNP to square – should politicians simply reject all invitations to appear on any programme knowing the disrespect they will experience, or turn up only to have their input cut or curtailed from the broadcast programme?
What we have to accept is that the BBC is biased, always has been and always will be. It is the propaganda arm of the British state after all. I rarely consume any BBC programmes now because I suspect it is not only news bulletins that are tainted. I remember a seemingly authoritative TV programme in the 70s not long after North Sea oil began to flow, asserting that the supply would run out in 10 years! I could quote a litany of other omissions and deceit.
When the BBC is caught with
the blood of a blatant lie on its hands, such as Sarah Smith reversing NHS statistics for England and Scotland, the correction – or heaven forfend apology – is seldom broadcast on the same platform but appears on some twilight programme or even the web.
It is difficult to know how many, if any, BBC reporters have integrity and honesty when posting their copy; but I doubt we will ever see the likes of John Pilger, Paul Mason or Derek Bateman on our screens (the last named did work at the BBC for 20 years, but resigned rather than dilute his integrity).
But perhaps the biggest con of all is that we pay for this propaganda– something many a dictator would kill for.
Richard Walthew
Duns
CHRISTOPHER Bruce, despite his experience, is mistaken about the derivatives of the Avro Lancaster bomber and their longevity (Letters, June 1).
It is true that the York, a straightforward conversion from military to civilian use, entered service during World War Two, initially intended for RAF Transport Command butalso allocated to BOAC, who kept it in service until 1951 as a passenger aircraft and until 1957 carrying freight.
There was, however, a “grandchild” of the Lancaster, via the Lincoln Bomber
derivative, which flew from 1951 until 1991,The renowned Shackleton started service on anti-submarine maritime patrol duties and carried on in this and search and rescue until these were taken over by the jet-engined Hawker-Siddely Nimrod in the 1970s.
A few “Shacks” were then converted for use as Airborne Early Warning systems but were superseded by the Boeing E-3 Sentry in 1991, thus ending a proud history of aviation engineering and capitulating to dependence on foreign supply of defence aircraft.
I do not share a history of involvement in either the military or the aviation industry, but a very early Christmas present of The Golden Wonder Book of the RAF kindled a life-long interest in these aircraft.
Les Hunter
Lanark
YET again there’s another review of a Central Belt restaurant (Scottish Life, June 2). Scotland has a wealth of amazing restaurants, using our fantastic local produce, throughout its length and breadth and I feel they equally deserve a mention like the Edinburgh and Glasgow ones.
Elizabeth Wilson
Ballater
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here