A FUTURE Labour peer speaking about her own party on BBC Scotland probably didn’t expect to be called out. But that’s exactly what happened to Ayesha Hazarika when she appeared on the Sunday Show.
The former advisor to Gordon Brown had been speaking about Labour as if it was not a party she is closely linked to – let alone one she is about to represent for life in the unelected House of Lords.
Asked if people know what Keir Starmer stands for, the soon-to-be-peer Hazarika said: “I think the question on that, there is an argument, a narrative, that says people don’t really know what he stands for, but on the other hand any time the public anywhere round the country are coming in contact with the ballot box, they are voting for him.”
READ MORE: 'Entirely untrue': Anas Sarwar caught out over SNP claims in BBC interview
Coming into contact with a ballot box won’t be something Hazarika has to worry about once she’s taken her seat in the Lords.
Either way, she went on: “I would say what the Labour party is doing effectively is putting forward an offer that people like. They’re putting forward candidates that – Rochdale aside – candidates that people are moving towards.
“Their ground operation has got a lot better. The overall message has got a lot better.”
Luckily, National columnist Andrew Tickell was on hand.
Why is BBC Scotland allowing future Labour Baroness Ayesha Hazarika to pose as an independent journalist? And why is the wife of a Labour candidate hosting the show? #sundayshow pic.twitter.com/tVG7LDqpOR
— Phantom Power (@PhantomPower14) February 18, 2024
Asked to come in on what Hazarika had said, Tickell began: “Can I just clarify, you referred to the Labour Party as ‘they’ throughout that. Do you mean ‘we’?”
Responding, Hazarika said: “I suppose it’s ‘they/we’, but currently I’m not in the House of Lords.”
Tickell said it was a “curious feature” of Hazarika’s contribution that she had spoken of Labour as something she was not a part of.
In response, the soon-to-be-peer – who the BBC host had announced as such – said she was “not in the leadership of the Labour party”.
“I would say ‘they’ because I’m not in the inner sanctum of the decision-making process,” Hazarika added.
She’ll certainly be a party member though ...
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel