A RESOLUTION has been reached in the long-running industrial dispute at City of Glasgow College.

Members of the Educational Institute of Scotland – Further Education Lecturers Association (EIS-FELA) backed the resolution in a ballot which closed on Friday.

The National: The dispute was over compulsory redundancies and an increase in workloadThe dispute was over compulsory redundancies and an increase in workload

The deal means that no compulsory redundancies will take place, and staff who were previously made redundant will be offered the opportunity to return or to receive voluntary severance.

An overwhelming 86% of members voting in the ballot backed the agreement reached between the EIS and the college.

Charlie Montgomery, EIS-FELA branch convener at City of Glasgow College, said: "We are obviously delighted that this dispute has been brought to an end without the unnecessary compulsory redundancies originally demanded by the college.

READ MORE: Incredible full clip of BBC presenter's 'middle finger' countdown released

“We hope, going forward, the college will recognise the need to abide by the principles of 'Fair Work' and no longer try to enforce upon staff, changes in their employment status, or terms and conditions without proper negotiations with recognised trade unions.

“It is to be hoped, with proper governance put in place and the adoption of a collegiate attitude, City of Glasgow College can look forward to a more stable period of industrial relations that should benefit staff and students alike.”

Commenting on the ballot result, EIS general secretary Andrea Bradley said: “This very clear ballot result brings the programme of industrial action at City of Glasgow College to an end.

“EIS-FELA members at the college are to be commended for the strong stance they have taken in defence of lecturing jobs and quality education provision at the college.

READ MORE: New BBC chairman approved by MPs despite 'serious reservations'

“It has been a long and difficult struggle which has taken its toll on lecturers and students alike, but it was a price worth paying to fight job and course cuts and to protect education for today’s and tomorrow’s students at the college.”

The dispute first began over cuts to teaching time, workload increases, the ending of fixed term contracts and compulsory redundancies.