MINISTERS have been urged to hold a rapid review into “the impact of extreme trans rights activism on women’s rights”.
SNP MP Joanna Cherry called on the Government to condemn “violence and intimidation” against women by trans rights campaigners.
She referenced a letter sent by the campaign group Sex Matters to the Prime Minister, which asked him to “take urgent action to halt an escalating campaign of violence and intimidation against women in the name of trans rights”.
In the Commons, Cherry said: “Will she (justice minister Laura Farris) condemn this violence and intimidation and will she urge the Prime Minister to do so as well, and commit to addressing it by commissioning a rapid review on the impact of extreme trans rights activism on women’s rights and the rights of lesbians, and will she also open a call for evidence?”
Farris said: “I certainly condemn the conduct that she has described. Even though holding a gender-critical belief is protected in law… I am aware of the polarisation, sometimes intimidation that surrounds debate.
READ MORE: Joanna Cherry: I felt 'hostility' from Stand staff at Fringe event
“I have seen the letter that Sex Matters wrote to the Prime Minister, and she should be in no doubt as to how seriously this is viewed.”
Farris added: “She’s asked for a rapid review and I would like to meet her and discuss this further to discuss next steps.”
The letter from Sex Matters to Rishi Sunak claimed that “extreme trans activism constitutes a broad and sustained campaign against women who stand up for women’s rights”, citing the example of placards at marches which included the phrase “Decapitate TERFs” (trans-exclusionary radical feminists) among others.
“We call on you, Prime Minister, to lead the fightback. We urge you to condemn the violence and intimidation against gender-critical women, to commit to addressing it and to open a call for evidence,” it said.
Among the signatories were leading figures in the gender critical movement, including the researcher Maya Forstater and author Helen Joyce.
Sex Matters has since claimed that many people who added personal comments to the letter did so under a pseudonym.
The group wrote that “many people pointed out the implications of not being able to sign with their real names.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel