A LABOUR by-election candidate who previously quit the party over its Brexit stance has said rejoining the EU is “not a question for just now”.
Michael Shanks, the party’s candidate for Rutherglen and Hamilton West, said he would back reversing Brexit if there was a public appetite for a rethink.
The 35-year-old previously quit Labour in 2019 describing its approach to EU membership as “bankrupt”.
READ MORE: Scottish Trans given permission to intervene in block challenge
Shanks has previously been criticised for saying he would vote against Labour leader Keir Starmer on the two-child benefit cap and other issues.
But now, the Westminster by-election candidate, who was previously at the heart of claims of a “stitch up” over the selection for the race to become an MP, has tried to yet again distance himself from Starmer.
Starmer has said that the party’s stance is now to make Brexit work, rather than to seek to rejoin the bloc.
In an interview with the Daily Record, Shanks said he still “believes in the European project”.
The modern studies teacher said he supported a closer relationship with the bloc, adding: “I think that's the natural point that we are at already.
“Even the Conservatives have reluctantly accepted that that's the only way forward.
“So absolutely, we must have a closer relationship. In so many ways, it just makes logical sense.”
However, when asked if he would like the UK to rejoin the EU one day, he said: “I think it's not a question for just now, but I still see the UK as having a place in the European Union.
READ MORE: Scottish independence support remains steady in new poll
"So yes, if it got to a point where there was clearly a public appetite for the conversation again, I wouldn't be against us rejoining the European Union. Of course not.
“Because I have not changed my principles or the idea that the European project is good for all of us.”
Shanks added that having the conversation around rejoining the EU becomes a “distraction” from making “what we’ve got work just now”.
In the Brexit referendum, 62% of Scots voted for the UK to remain in the EU.
When he quit Labour in 2019, Shanks blasted the party leadership under Jeremy Corbyn and said it was “impossible” to reconcile the state the party was in with its “core values”.
“A party that has such a bankrupt approach to our membership of the EU and is complacent about the impact it will have on the poorest people across the UK does not share those values,” he wrote in a lengthy blog post announcing he had resigned his membership.
“A party that has been woefully inadequate in tackling antisemitism time and time and time again does not have those values at its core.
READ MORE: BBC Scotland political editor Glenn Campbell to undergo brain tumour surgery
“And aside from all that, it’s a party that seems oblivious to how utterly unelectable it has become.”
After Shanks claimed he would vote against Starmer on a number of issues, First Minister Humza Yousaf rubbished the claims - and pointed out that Starmer would have to vote on the issue for the MP-hopeful to vote against the issue, something the Labour leader had repeatedly ruled out.
We told how SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn hit out at Labour’s “entitlement” as he joined the campaign trail with SNP candidate and local councillor Katy Loudon in Cambuslang.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel