A SCOTTISH trans advocacy group has said it has been given permission to intervene in a legal challenge against Westminster’s block on transgender law reforms.
Scottish Trans, which forms part of the LGBT rights charity the Equality Network, said it had been given permission by the Court of Session to submit written arguments to support the Scottish Government’s arguments against the UK block on its Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill.
The bill was blocked by Scottish Secretary Alister Jack earlier this year, in an unprecedented move which infuriated the Holyrood administration and trans rights activists.
The controversial legislation sought to make it easier for transgender people to obtain a gender recognition certificate – which allows people to change their legally recognised sex on documents such as birth certificates – but critics said it would have collapsed the legal distinction between sex and gender, potentially posing threats to women’s safety.
Jack blocked the bill with a Section 35 order, arguing it would have interfered with UK-wide equalities law.
The case against his decision, brought by the Scottish Government, is set to be heard between September 19 and 23 this year.
READ MORE: Alister Jack says UK Government will 'robustly defend' gender bill veto
Vic Valentine, the manager of Scottish Trans said: “The Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill would significantly improve the process that trans men and women in Scotland use to update the sex recorded on their birth certificates, so that at important moments of their lives, such as registering to be married, they would be able to show a document that reflects who they truly are.
“More than 30 countries or territories around the world have laws that are similar to or even more progressive than the one agreed by a large majority of MSPs at the end of last year.
“Evidence from those places shows that all these laws result in are better lives for trans people.
“We think that it is very important that the voices and views of trans people in Scotland are heard in this case, which is why we applied to intervene.
“The UK Government’s block of this bill does nothing but force trans men and women to continue to have to use an intrusive, difficult and expensive process, simply to live their lives with the dignity we all deserve.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel