THE income gap between typical and poorer households could widen even further if the UK Government ploughs on with its regressive approach to benefits, a report has warned.
The Resolution Foundation says "the UK has been living through a period of relative decline that has proved toxic for those on low-to-middle incomes".
It warns poor economic growth, and a failure to fairly distribute wealth, could see poorer household incomes rise by only 2% over the next decade, compared to 12% for typical households and 14% for the those in the top income quintile - widening the income gap between typical and poorer households from £18,000 to £21,000.
This would mean 1.8 million more people, including one million children, falling into relative poverty.
READ MORE: Prime Minister Rishi Sunak insists UK is 'not s**t'
The report – called Sharing the Benefits - says this “prosperity gap” is a result of the UK Government's regressive approach to the benefits system, where amounts rise by prices rather than wages, meaning basic benefit support is at the same level now in real terms as it was in 1992, despite a 51% growth in GDP per capita since then.
It warns this approach could see the Universal Credit standard allowance fall from 14% of earnings in 2025/26 to 12% in 2035/36 and 10% in 2045-46, compared to 17% in 2000-1.
SNP social justice spokesperson, David Linden, said the report laid bare how Brexit and Westminster mismanagement have sent the UK into long-term decline.
He said: “The UK is in dire need of radical change but neither the Tories or pro-Brexit Labour Party are offering a genuine alternative - showing why Scotland needs to escape Westminster control with independence.
"Brexit, austerity cuts and Westminster mismanagement have set the UK on the path to long-term decline - with stagnant wages, poor economic growth, and worsening living standards.
"Rejoining the EU, and properly investing in Scotland's renewable energy powerhouse potential, is the only credible path to sustained economic growth.
"The SNP Scottish Government is leading the way with limited devolved powers; delivering progressive policies like the Scottish Child Payment, baby box, Best Start Grant, rent controls, free personal care, and other measures to build a fairer society - but progress is being undermined by Brexit, Westminster cuts and damaging policies that are making people poorer across the UK.
"The SNP will continue to press the UK Government to introduce a real living wage, boost benefits and deliver urgent help for families - but independence is the only route to real change.”
Mike Brewer, chief economist at the Resolution Foundation, warned: “Economic growth – the essential precondition for rising wages – is sorely needed after 15 years of stagnation.”
“But it’s equally important that this rising prosperity is widely shared.”
He called for “a strategy that delivers productivity growth alongside reforms to employment, pay, benefits and housing costs" - including pre-distribution through higher wages and redistribution through the benefits system.
He added: “All political parties say they want to see a return to rising, and shared, prosperity. But only combining an end to Britain’s productivity stagnation with major reforms to our economy and benefits system can make that a reality – getting incomes up and inequality down.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here