BARD in the Botanics (BiB) – the long-running mini-festival of Shakespeare and other classic plays that is staged in Glasgow’s Botanic Gardens every summer – is a thing of wonder.
Underfunded and operating on a shoestring, director Gordon Barr’s company never ceases to impress in its combination of dedication, courage and skill.
Those qualities are very much to the fore in BiB’s new production of Shakespeare’s Henry IV, which plays in the glorious Kibble Palace glasshouse.
At the very outset of the run, the excellent actor Finlay McLean (who was set to play the titular king) had to withdraw due to ill health (we wish him a full and speedy recovery).
However, as the cliché has it, the show must go on, and so it does, with the fine Stephen Clyde stepping into the role of the embattled monarch Henry Bolingbroke.
READ MORE: Stone Me: Neolithic podcast takes Scots on standing stones adventure
Playing on Tuesday evening with book in hand, the actor gave a brave and accomplished performance which will only get better as he familiarises himself with his character.
This tremendous, little festival (in which Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar is currently playing on the outdoor stage, when the weather permits) is renowned for its innovations with, and careful truncating of, Shakespeare’s dramas. In adapting the two Henry IV plays into one, director Barr has fashioned an all-male piece, with just six characters, played by four actors.
As King Henry faces both an insurrection, led by Henry Percy (aka Hotspur), and the impatient ambition of his son, Prince Henry (aka Hal), one is struck by the timelessness of the play.
Promotion poster (Image: BardintheBotanics)
Hotspur’s military uprising is decidedly Prigozhinite (albeit that it is, ultimately, more bloody than the aborted Russian rebellion), while Hal’s coveting of his father’s crown would not be out of place in the recent hit TV series Succession.
The typically simple set – which has the king’s throne at one end and the counter of a pub (complete with a tap for a famous Scottish ale) at the other – reflects two of the major players in the drama (namely, regal power and alcohol).
The cast is universally superb
Johnny Panchaud has more costume changes than a Kylie Minogue concert as he switches between the three roles of Lord Westmoreland (chief courtier to the king), the mutinous Hotspur and Prince Hal’s boyhood friend Ned Poins.
The actor plays all three roles with equal passion and aplomb (including, in a neat reference to the Wars of the Roses, a Yorkshire-accented Hotspur).
Sam Stopford’s Hal achieves a perfect balance between adolescent japery and sinister duplicity. However, most of the production’s humour emanates from Alan Steele’s hilarious playing of the ageing reprobate Sir John Falstaff.
Whether in his self-aggrandising falsehoods or his colossal drinking, Steele’s blue-blooded miscreant is fabulously comic. Yet, he is also touching in his regretful yearning for his enthusiastically misspent youth.
From up-to-the-moment political and cultural parallels, to the evergreen themes of ambition and over-indulgence, this is another memorably vital, cleverly abridged Shakespeare from Bard in the Botanics.
Until July 8: bardinthebotanics.co.uk
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel