WE’D come to expect it from Boris Johnson. Amidst all the blundering and blabbering, the former Tory prime minister could often be heard to label his SNP opponents as being from the “Scottish Nationalist Party”.
Despite being scolded by the Commons Speaker for his jibes, Johnson continued to use the same old “nationalist” line – apparently insisted upon by former Union Unit head Oliver Lewis.
When Johnson did it, the motivations were clear: to annoy and agitate. But what about when one of the UK’s top political broadcasters does it?
Enter Paul Brand, ITV’s UK editor who is known for breaking partygate stories including the video of Allegra Stratton joking about a Christmas event held at the peak of lockdown.
READ MORE: Celtic fans sing 'you can shove your coronation up your a***' at Old Firm clash
Writing on a new poll commissioned by ITV – which found just 37% of Scots support the monarchy – Brand said: “Of equal concern for the King, support for the monarchy also varies greatly across the UK.
“Not for centuries has a coronation taken place at quite such a moment of jeopardy for the Union.
“During her reign, the Queen was often considered to be a unifying figure across the UK, save for among the divided communities of Northern Ireland. Even the Scottish Nationalist Party (SNP) proposed to keep her as head of state in an independent Scotland.
“However, our polling shows Charles III is anything but universally admired throughout his kingdom.”
You might have thought that the UK editor of ITV News – who was also a hot favourite to take over from Laura Kuenssberg as BBC political editor – would know what SNP stands for.
Then, you might have thought the BBC would have had it nailed down by now, considering the SNP has been in power since 2007.
But just last year they were out there making the same mistake, introducing a councillor from the “Scottish Nationalist Party”.
After the Jouker got in touch, ITV have corrected Brand's story. It now reads: "Even the Scottish National Party (SNP) proposed to keep her as head of state in an independent Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel