COMEDIAN Joe Lycett has accused Keir Starmer of "butchering" the description of his Qatar cash shredder stunt during an appearance in the House of Commons.
Speaking to Times Radio, Lycett discussed the stunt - in which he threatened to destroy £10,000 of his own money unless David Beckham pulled out of his deal with World Cup hosts Qatar, where homosexuality is still illegal.
Last month, Lycett released a video which appeared to show him shredding the cash but later revealed it was a hoax and he had already donated the money to LGBTQ+ charities.
Dismissing the idea he might stand as a Labour MP, he said: “I noticed that Keir Starmer referred to me as ‘somebody’ in the House of Commons and then completely butchered what I’d done with the David Beckham stuff.
“That was funny.”
READ MORE: David Beckham’s Qatar ambassador role disappoints Three Lions Pride co-founder
Speaking during PMQs, Starmer has asked Rishi Sunak: “You may have seen this week that somebody shredded £10,000 in protest at those propping up an oil and gas giant. But he shreds £10,000 every other minute propping them up. Which does he think is the more absurd?”
Also in the interview, Lycett criticised the Football Association (FA), accusing it of “pretending to be allies of the LGBT community” until it becomes inconvenient.
The comedian, 34, said he had had “some conversations” with the English governing body after announcing a stunt.
Speaking on Times Radio, the Birmingham-born stand-up and presenter admitted he “always knew” he would never hear from Beckham.
He said he was “trying to get hold of his number that week and just see if I could just ring him”.
But he added that “certain people get so famous” that “actually they don’t have a number, they just have people nearby who hold a phone for them and all that.
“I kind of knew I wouldn’t ever hear from him.”
Lycett said Beckham is “a perfect kind of emblem” of the way “a lot of brands particularly, and a lot of institutions, pretend to be allies of the LGBT community until it’s inconvenient for them”.
“And I would add the FA into that group actually,” he said.
“I had some conversations with the FA and they had sort of directed me to their statement about the One Love armband and how proud they were of all that.
“We know where we got to with that, don’t we?”
At the start of the contest, England and Wales, along with other European nations, announced they would not be wearing the anti-discrimination One Love rainbow armbands after governing body Fifa threatened sporting sanctions.
READ MORE: Comedian Joe Lycett gives brilliant sarcastic response to Liz Truss's BBC interview
Lycett said: “I won’t attack any of the footballers and all that because actually they might never get to do a World Cup again and it’s their careers.
“I think fair play to them. They’re in a really tricky situation and I’m sure they’ve all got individual opinions on it.
“But I felt that David Beckham, he isn’t being paid by Fifa or the World Cup. He’s being paid by Qatar allegedly.”
Lycett previously said Beckham’s team had reached out to him about the stunt but that he was “not satisfied” with the discussions.
Representatives of Beckham and the FA have been contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel