THE peer who was responsible for organising the Queen’s funeral has been banned from driving for six months after being caught using his mobile phone behind the wheel.
Earl Marshal Edward Fitzalan-Howard, the Duke of Norfolk, had tried to argue he needed his licence to arrange the King’s coronation but was prosecuted at Lavender Hill Magistrates’ Court on Monday.
He was stopped by police on April 7 after officers spotted him using the device as his BMW cut across their vehicle after going through a red light in Battersea, south-west London, said prosecutor Jonathan Bryan.
He told magistrates the highest-ranking duke in England had already totted up nine penalty points on his driving licence from two previous speeding offences in 2019.
Outlining the facts of the driving offence, prosecutor Jonathan Bryan said: “The time was just before 3.45pm, it was a Thursday. Officers were in a vehicle on Battersea Park Road when they saw a BMW.
“Officers were stationary at a traffic lights, which turned green.
“A BMW cut across them and on that basis the officers assumed it must have gone through a red light because their light was green.
“One of the officers noticed the driver was using a mobile phone while doing this and didn’t seem to be paying attention.
“The officers drove up to the BMW and saw through the window that the driver was using his mobile phone.
READ MORE: Kwasi Kwarteng refuses to comment on pound crash
“They spoke to the driver, who was his grace. There was a conversation about the use of a mobile phone.
“He said he had not been aware of going through the red light but accepted this was because he was using his mobile phone.
“He said he was in communication with his wife.”
Fitzalan-Howard, who is responsible for arranging the State Opening of Parliament, planned to argue “exceptional hardship” in a bid to keep his licence.
His lawyer Natasha Dardashti then made an application to exclude the public and press from that part of the hearing on grounds of national security.
“It is an extremely peculiar situation, whereby his grace, the Duke of Norfolk, the Earl Marshal, was responsible for the preparation and organisation of the funeral of Her Royal Highness Queen Elizabeth II and he is now the person in the country who is responsible for the coronation of His Royal Highness King Charles III,” she said.
READ MORE: Bank of England set to make emergency statement after pound plummets
“In relation to the exceptional hardship argument, his grace will need to provide some detail and information about the preparation of the coronation of His Royal Highness King Charles III.
“The application for this matter to be in camera is for reasons of national security and because details of this will be provided which have not yet been discussed with His Royal Highness, and not yet discussed with the Prime Minister and not yet discussed with the Archbishop of Canterbury.
“It would be unacceptable for these details to be made public or made known to risk the escape of that information of a very sensitive nature.”
Dardashti argued the information should be private until after the coronation, telling magistrates: “Very few people have been made aware of the date, the more sensitive the material the fewer people are yet to be involved in that.”
She said: “Organisation of a national state occasion involves considerable matters of national security, not just the public and officials in this country but world leaders attending the UK.
“In order to be able to properly advance this argument it would require his grace to go into details, and to allow the press to remain will prohibit him putting forward much of the information he needs to put.”
She added: “Given it is such an odd situation, and his grace has such a very, very particular and important role in this national coronation of a new King, I would ask this court to sit in camera.”
The Earl Marshal is the 18th Duke of Norfolk, who inherited the position upon the death of his father in 2002.
The duke is the most senior lay member of the Roman Catholic Church in Britain and a crossbench peer in the House of Lords.
An Oxford-educated father of five, he is a descendant of Elizabeth I and is also reported to be worth more than £100 million.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel