SCOTTISH independence can only be achieved through cross-party input, Joanna Cherry has said.
The SNP MP made the comment during an interview with Matt Forde at his Edinburgh Fringe show, The Political Party, on Monday.
Cherry added that a bid to break up the Union “cannot just be about” the SNP, suggesting support should be sought from members of other UK parties who “quietly support independence”.
Reflecting on the cross-party efforts to challenge Boris Johnson’s proroguing of the UK Parliament in 2019, the MP for Edinburgh South West said: “I think what I learned from that is if you want to achieve anything in politics, you really have to work cross-party.
READ MORE: Ruth Davidson dismisses claims she's set for pro-Union tour with Arlene Foster
“That’s the big lesson of Scottish devolution. Devolution was delivered by cross-party working.
“Independence will only come with cross-party working. It can’t just be about my party.
“We have to reach out to other parties, and I don’t just mean the smaller independence parties. I also mean members of other parties, who are what I call the persuadables who quietly support independence. These people exist in the Labour Party and the LibDems.”
Cherry also spoke out about her experience in receiving online abuse, and her disappointment in having had “no support whatsoever” from her party’s leadership.
Reflecting on public criticism from within her own party, the SNP MP said: “We do have a rule that we’re not supposed to criticise policy or each other in public.”
But she added: “In the last few years, you will have seen many members of the SNP and parliamentarians calling me a transphobe, a bigot, calling for me to have the whip removed.
“And worse, you know, most people will know that a member of the SNP threatened to rape me and went to court, and was convicted of that.
“Nobody in my party has ever condemned it, because, I presume, people are afraid to condemn someone who threatens to rape a transphobe in case they themselves are called transphobic.”
Cherry continued: “I’ve come in for a fair amount of criticism for diverging from party policy on this issue of self-identification.
“In actual fact, the SNP conference has never passed a motion to support self-identification. The SNP manifesto supported reforming the Gender Recognition Act, which I have no problem with.”
She said that she does not understand why the SNP’s party leader, Nicola Sturgeon, and Westminster leader, Ian Blackford, have not yet reached out to offer support over her receiving online abuse, but added that she has received support “privately from colleagues” in the aftermath.
“I think, maybe, they are afraid that if they’re seen supporting me, they will be tarred with the same brush,” Cherry said, “and it’s just a very unfortunate state of affairs that we put ourselves into.”
She added that she was left “very upset” after a leaked recording appeared to show Blackford calling for support for former colleague Patrick Grady, who resigned his party membership after an investigation was conducted over accusations of inappropriate behaviour.
“I thought it was interesting to hear exhortations of support for a colleague that has been found guilty of sexual harassment, and no exhortations of support for a female colleague who was threatened with rape by a party member,” she said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel