THE Scottish Greens are backing a group of Bellshill residents who are challenging development plans that would place an industrial complex as close as two metres away from their homes.
Development plans for Bellshill’s Oval estate - that would see the building of two industrial warehouses, an HGV access road and an employee car park - have sparked serious concerns over noise and environmental impact.
Earlier this year, the developer's application was rejected by North Lanarkshire Council’s planning committee but since then Clowes Developments have appealed the decision to the Scottish Government reporter.
READ MORE: Kelvingrove Art Gallery becomes first UK museum service to repatriate items to India
Scottish Green MSP Gillian Mackay has continuously campaigned alongside the residents and has stressed that the original application was rejected for good reason.
She said: “It is clear that this is a development that neither the residents or North Lanarkshire Council think is suitable for the location.
“The council planning committee have already rejected the application on a number of key issues, from the noise impact on residential amenity to the damage to natural environment, removal of green space and much more.
“I hope that the Scottish Government reporter takes on board the valid concerns from those who live in the area and comes to the correct conclusion.”
Richard Kerr, a spokesperson for the residents, has warned that the plans will “ruin lives” and destroy the last undeveloped part of grounds that are home to abundant wildlife.
He said: “Local residents are devastated that Clowes Developments decided to appeal the decision to refuse planning permission. Despite widespread grave concerns about the massive detrimental impact these proposals will have on local residents.
“This development will ruin the lives of local residents and destroy the last undeveloped part of the old Bellshill Maternity Hospital grounds, which is home to many wildlife species. Planning regulations are supposed to protect local residents from this type of inappropriate development so close to residents homes. We are all praying that the appeal is dismissed.”
Kerr has also accused Clowes Developments of “brazenly attempting to exploit weak noise planning rules” as well as “inappropriately comparing” road traffic background noise with the noise of an HGV access road.
He added: “We now face the dire prospect of experiencing HGV engine noise and piercing reverse tonal alarms from 7.00am to 11.00pm, 7 days a week, literally on our doorstep.”
Clowes Developments has been contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here