QUESTIONS on how the BBC should be funded and how the corporation should adapt to evolving consumer habits and needs will be explored in a new inquiry by the House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee.
Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries had previously announced that the BBC licence fee would be frozen for the next two years, and said she wanted to find a new funding model for the broadcaster after the current licence fee funding deal expires in 2027.
BBC bosses have warned that the licence fee freeze will leave them with an annual £285 million shortfall by 2027-28.
The committee’s inquiry will address issues including how new technologies and consumer habits will change the broadcasting landscape and what is the purpose of a national broadcaster.
It will explore what principles and priorities should inform the choice of the funding model, and how any alternative models would affect what the BBC can provide.
READ MORE: Nadine Dorries is in a dizzying spin cycle over BBC licence fee freeze
The inquiry will also look at how the BBC should change to prepare for the longer term future, as well as what is needed from the Government to inform its BBC funding plans.
Baroness Stowell of Beeston, chair of the committee, said: “The broadcasting landscape is shifting rapidly, with intense competition, rising production costs and changing viewing habits.
“Developments in technology have led to increasing choice for people about what they watch, how and when.
“Our inquiry will look at this changing media landscape and examine how the BBC should be funded in the future to deliver what is needed from a national public service broadcaster.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel