SCOTTISH Greens MSP Patrick Harvie has taken an arch-Unionist to task for a comment about his co-leader Lorna Slater.
Labour peer George Foulkes was responding to details of the deal struck between the SNP and Scottish Greens, with the two party leaders appearing beside First Minister Nicola Sturgeon at Bute House yesterday.
Baron Foulkes of Cumnock, former minister of State for Scotland, felt compelled to share his ire at the co-operation agreement.
He wrote on Twitter: “Just as Patrick Harvie and his Green sidekick sign a deal to get ministerial posts and limousines, ScotRail announce service cuts forcing more people into cars. #greensellout”
Just as @patrickharvie & his Green sidekick sign a deal to get Ministerial posts and limousines Scotrail announce service cuts forcing more people into cars.#greensellout
— George Foulkes (@GeorgeFoulkes) August 20, 2021
Harvie hit back at Foulkes for failing to show respect to Slater.
He replied: “He can't bring himself to even use the name of a successful, articulate woman. She's called Lorna Slater and she's awesome!
READ MORE: BBC mocked for embarrassing gaffe on SNP-Greens deal in Radio 4 bulletin
“If this deal goes through, you'll still see me getting about on my bike, as we set about our £5 billion rail investment, and take ScotRail back into public hands.”
Slater added: “I think he's afraid of another pile on, like the one he got when he dissed me the other week.”
I think he's afraid of another pile on, like the one he got when he dissed me the other week. pic.twitter.com/xHvTmTKWjU
— Lorna Slater (@lornaslater) August 21, 2021
Foulkes – a life peer in the unelected House of Lords, alongside Baroness of Lundin Links Ruth Davidson – last week faced a backlash after telling of his confusion at Slater’s election.
READ MORE: FACT-CHECK: BBC presenter WRONG to say legal indyref2 powers lie with UK
He said: “As a former beneficiary of the eccentricities of the Holyrood election system, even I am perplexed how Lorna Slater managed to get selected and elected and may even be joining the Scottish Government. I would welcome hearing the low down on the process.”
As a former beneficiary of the eccentricities of the Holyrood election system, even I am perplexed how Lorna Slater managed to get selected and elected and may even be joining the Scottish Government. I would welcome hearing the low down on the process.
— George Foulkes (@GeorgeFoulkes) August 14, 2021
As well as the process of electing list MSPs, Unionist Foulkes, who was at Holyrood for four years, has also had difficulty understanding devolution.
Last year, First Minister Nicola Sturgeon explained that Scotland would maintain the “stay at home” coronavirus guidance after Downing Street changed its slogan to “stay alert” without consulting Scotland.
Foulkes wrote: “Scotland is one of the nations of the United Kingdom & the UK Parliament remains responsible for all of the UK.”
Devolution means his statement is wrong across a number of policy areas.
The Cumnock Baron took credit last year for the BBC’s decision to stop regularly broadcasting the First Minister’s coronavirus briefings.
He said it came after “representations” made by himself and Labour’s Jackie Baillie.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel