INVERNESS AND NAIRN
Winner in 2016: Fergus Ewing (SNP)
INVERNESS and Nairn’s predecessor seat of Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber had the distinction of being the only SNP constituency “gain” in the inaugural Holyrood election of 1999 – in other words it was the only constituency the party won without having taken the equivalent Westminster seat in the 1997 General Election.
It therefore added a small touch of glitter to a mildly disappointing national result. The winning SNP candidate was Fergus Ewing, husband of Margaret Ewing, who had been a Westminster MP for 17 of the previous 25 years. He was moved to observe: “Anything my wife can do, I can do later.”
Labour’s David Stewart held the Westminster seat at the time, courtesy of the Blair landslide, and indeed Labour were also Ewing’s nearest challengers in the early years of devolution. But this is far from being natural Labour territory.
Russell Johnston had held the predecessor constituency for the Liberals and then the LibDems for an uninterrupted spell between 1964 and 1997. Prior to that the Tories had been the dominant local force for a while.
The first sign that the tide was turning came in 1992 with one of the most peculiar results in UK political history: the LibDems held on, but with only 26% of the vote. Either Labour or the SNP, who took 25.1% and 24.7% respectively, could easily have made the gain, so it was rather fitting that by the end of the decade both parties had a share of the spoils.
The difference was that Labour’s breakthrough proved to be transitory, while Ewing has remained the constituency MSP for the entire period of devolution to date, with increasingly large majorities.
By 2016, he was winning for the SNP by almost 11,000 votes and it was the Conservatives who had moved into a very distant second place. It would take an enormous swing of more than 14% to dislodge him this year and that is extremely unlikely to happen.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here