DESPITE the fact there is a worldwide Covid-19 pandemic and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency is debilitated by a cyber attack, Viridor has chosen to proceed with a consultation process to erect an incinerator in South Lanarkshire.
In addition, South Lanarkshire Council have released their updated Local Plan which would appear, from the changes, to support such facilities against the overwhelming view of residents throughout the local authority area and efforts to reduce climate-changing emissions.
The Local Plan (Volume 2; Chapter 2) states that the council are seeking to support the introduction of applications for incineration. Further, changes to the plan in comparison with the previous plan support this view. Indeed, South Lanarkshire Council states that there is a “requirement” for an incinerator.
READ MORE: Covid has brought our final opportunity to build a fairer, greener nation
This is untrue and is in fact contrary to both South Lanarkshire Council’s commitment to reduce greenhouses gases and contrary to the Scottish Government’s targets to reduce CO2 greenhouse gas emissions in tackling climate change.
We must ask,is South Lanarkshire Council a fair decision-maker on a “major” planning application by Viridor when it currently has a 10-year multimillion-pound contract with Viridor (with the option for a further five years) to process municipal waste?
The real question is … would South Lanarkshire Council be supporting such an application if there was going to be no financial return in excess of £1 million in business rates? In addition, would Viridor be erecting an incinerator if there was no profit to be gained from installing incinerators that pollute our air, soil and water ways?
Dovesdale Action Group would argue there is a need for such applications to be dealt with at a national planning level in understanding the broader needs of how we address the issue of waste. If we are to follow South Lanarkshire Council’s view that there is a “requirement” for local authorities to erect incinerators, then the impact on global warming through climate change would be disastrous for all concerned in Scotland. This is unacceptable.
In fact do we really need incineration at all? Dovesdale Action Group believe there are alternatives, as do other national organisations. There are numerous international studies highlighting the issues and threats incinerators pose globally.
Emissions in the waste sector are currently around 1.9 megatonnes per year. Nationally we have made good progress in reducing this but we can do better. Much better. In fact, Dovesdale Action Group strongly believe a national moratorium of all new applications for incinerators in Scotland should be sought while establishing the impact of an increasing number of such developments on our health and environment as well as the impact on climate change, contrary to the Government’s own zero-waste strategy.
Alas money does not, in reality, make the world go round, the climate does, and if we are going to protect our communities and our planet, the incineration of waste must stop NOW. The responsibility to influence that change lies with all of us. If we value our health, economy and our environment we need to encourage our political representatives of all political shades to reflect and take action, to lead us on a new path free from incineration that protects us all and our climate.
We would encourage the people of Lanarkshire to support our campaign to prevent this latest move by Viridor to pollute our air and indeed our environment.
John Young
Dovesdale Action Group
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel