YES indeed, John Edgar (Expect to see more attempts to rig the votes in Scotland, November 19), we need our eyes everywhere, but it is even worse than that! For a Bill has been put forward the likes of which I have never seen in my adult life. Among other things, unless amended, it would allow say, the Home Office to authorise the fiddling of elections by any of the intelligence services – and without comeback and with the UK government washing its hands of the whole business! It is about sanctioning underhand and lawless behaviour.
I am no lawyer, but the Bill basically seems to say that, during undercover work, in certain circumstances it will be OK for a lot of public bodies to commit crime with impunity and even for them to instigate such work. That is quite a thought!
What I am talking about is the Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill, which seeks to legitimise criminal, investigatory behaviour, allowing this to be officially authorised – wait for it – by public bodies such as the police forces, the intelligence services, the armed forces, Revenue and Customs, Government Departments – Health and Care, Home Office, Ministry of Justice, and other bodies such as the Competition and Markets Authority, The Environment Agency, the Food Standards Agency and the Gambling Commission!
Surely not! You can’t have the Ministry of Justice choosing to break the law – and the Gambling Commission? Phew!
So what on earth would justify such criminal actions by these bodies? Apparently, if it is done:
a) in the interests of national security;
b) for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime or of preventing disorder: or
c) in the interests of the economic well-being of the United Kingdom (I quote from Section 1 (5) subsection (5) on page 2.)
Consider for a moment a few of the sinister implications of this. National security? Does this actually mean in the interests of safeguarding the Union? That anybody standing up for Scottish Independence would be fair game and with no prosecution of the assailants or of the body that authorised this?
Undercover gangs could be hired ostensibly to prevent disorder, or even instigate disorder if in the cause of Unionist Britain. And what does the “economic well-being of the UK” imply for those activities which predominantly further the Scottish economy as opposed say, to that of the south of England?
And with no redress? No person or official body held accountable, even the initiator of this Bill, the UK Government? There is “corresponding provision” for Scotland, which seems to give worrying power, not to the Scottish Government but to the Secretary of State. In the draft Bill, if passed, the Act could condone even murder and torture as acceptable methods of safeguarding say the interests of big business and without the perpetrators being prosecuted. This, you might say is “not British”. Nor is it the fair play we have come to expect. In fact, it is unbelievable and more like a horror story, yet it is what we in Scotland are up against.
In fact, this Bill is going through the UK Parliament at this very moment. The House of Lords is suggesting many humanising amendments to this authorised criminal behaviour, such as ruling out murder and torture. Let us hope some of these amendments are accepted. There is also a petition to scrap this Bill entirely. Let us hope, too, that today’s announcement of increased spending on the armed forces has nothing to do with this.
The proposed power grab has made independence for Scotland a matter of urgency. However, we are moving into new territory in which, if this Bill is not withdrawn, these threatened measures by the Tory Government could render Independence virtually impossible without ..... I hate to think. Certainly it is a recipe for chaos and mayhem as we are dragged over the Brexit cliff.
Valerie Waters
East Lothian
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel