I WASN’T particularly thinking of International Women’s Day when I chanced into the Scottish National Portrait Gallery the other day. After all, I’m surrounded by women every day. But I was bowled over by so much of what was there, highlighting recent and not-so-recent Scottish “personalities”, home-grown and adopted. The many portraits of women, well kent and lesser so, all of whom have played and are playing their part in forging Scotland.
Wendy Wood featured, and I heard a story I hadn’t heard before, and can’t see in any notices about her. Yes, she did tear down the Union flag at Stirling Castle, but the story I heard was that she painted a Union flag on the floorboard, presumably in her last home, shared with her partner Florence St John Cadwell at Whinmill Brae here in Edinburgh. She then covered it over. Carpet? Lino? Rug? The story wasn’t that detailed. But every day, every party, birthday, Hogmanay, it got a good stomping on. From what I’ve read of Wendy Wood, I kind of believe it.
READ MORE: Joanna Cherry: Independence is the best hope for women and girls
For some folks, Wendy Wood might be “history”, but let’s face it, history is populated by women who are forgotten, lost, ignored, or falsely portrayed. Perhaps they’re there as an appendage; daughter of, married to, consort, victim. From past to present, unsung and unremembered. Butchers, bakers, yes, candlestick makers, linguists, lollipop women, mathematicians, chefs, scientists.
And artists like Artemisia Gentileschi (approx 1593-1656), passed over, with her work attributed to other named artists (male, obviously). And if she is at all remembered, then it is as a rape victim. Her paintings still resonate with the passion she poured onto the canvasses; the pain, torture, the injustices she survived. Her works are only now to be given a first exhibition in London. How many generations has it taken to be recognised?
READ MORE: Romania has narrowest gender pay gap in the EU, new report reveals
Due to social requirements of the days past, so-called good manners, decency and respectability made it unimaginable for women to be playwrights, authors, public figures. From the known like Aphra Benns to the Brontes and George Elliot. But here, too,do we remember and honour the likes of Anne Hume, 1644, translator, poet, writer, Scottish? She wasn’t alone with her skills, talents and contributions to Scottish herstory. But neither is she alone in the wilderness, which is heavily populated by women.
It was in that wilderness that I found Harriet Powers, illiterate, a “folk” artist. Not a real artist, you understand, because of her background as an African-American slave and illiteracy. Merely a quilt maker from rural Georgia. Nothing “special”, nor “innovative”, just “traditional craft”, “women’s work”, depicting “local legends” and Bible stories. And by that as she was perceived, and in her time, so was determined her status, or lack of, by others. It’s not surprising that only two of her many wonderfully pictorial, historical pieces from 1886-1898 remain, and then the bombshell as late as 2009 when a letter was discovered that showed Harriet was in fact literate and had lovingly quilted the stories she’d read into her creations, those glowing, imaginative, practical quilts.
Having begun with a personality such as Wendy Wood, if I come full circle, how much do I admire Margaret Macdonald Mackintosh, whose artistry and design helped define the Glasgow Style of the 1890s and beyond. Her inspiration was not least that of Rosetti and Morris, but came from her love of Celtic poems, her roots. A recent Glasgow exhibition contained her work, as well as that of her husband Charles Rennie Mackintosh, who had the grace to say: “Margaret has genius, I have only talent”.
So please can we hear it, regularly, not just annually for the mammies, the grannies, aunties, sisters, cousins. The women who pioneered our health service, our trades unions, who worked and fought to begin dismantling the societal barriers that many still refuse to see. Women whose inventiveness and determination transcends the hardships, wars, famines, refugee camps, inequalities, to do their best and more for their families, their communities. It would be such a wrong for us to ignore them. Let’s face it, we’re standing on the shoulders of all those wonderful women who went before us.
Selma Rahman
Edinburgh
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel