RUTH Davidson may have returned to politics a few backs boldly claiming that it's "very clear that a majority of Scots don't want" independence, but she might want to take a few notes from the EU election results.
The Scottish Conservative leader's campaign was heavily focused on opposing a second independence referendum, even putting out a campaign flyer that mentioned indy 15 times but no actual policies.
READ MORE: Stirling Tories are taking the EU election result REALLY badly
Despite the fact it was blatantly obvious that being pro-Union was the party's main platform at this EU election, and Davidson's insistence that a vote for the Tories would send Sturgeon a message, it looks like this tactic didn't work too well in their favour.
Speaking with @RuthDavidsonMSP following the Scottish result - her reaction to holding onto their one seat and also if the campaign to send a message to Nicola Sturgeon has been successful pic.twitter.com/bmqgBMcmUF
— Alan Smith (@Political_AlanS) May 27, 2019
And now, following the Conservatives' dismal election performance, Davidson is trying to make voters forget all that via some classic political question avoidance.
Asked by journalist Alan Smith whether she thought her attempts to send a message to the FM had worked, Davidson replied: “It was clear before the election the Conservatives were going to get a kicking across the UK for not delivering Brexit as promised.
“This election – to a Parliament we are already supposed to have left – had a unique set of circumstances.
“That we held our seat in Scotland is primarily down to the hard work of our campaigning team and I thank each and every one of them.
“The arrival of the Brexit Party demonstrates the clear frustration of the Scottish electorate that Brexit still isn’t sorted.
READ MORE: Unionist parties under fire as EU election flyers ignore 'elephant in the room'
“I will redouble my efforts to ensure all those across the country seeking to get rid of the nationalist government at Holyrood feel able to come together and support my team at future elections.
“Dividing the pro-Union vote only benefits one party – the SNP.”
The old avoidance tactic is a favourite of Davidson's, and in the brief time she's been back at Holyrood since her maternity leave she's made good use of it.
She was accused by the SNP of "rewriting history" over her Section 30 stance a few weeks back.
READ MORE: Davidson accused of ‘rewriting history’ over Section 30 stance
Can anyone keep up with her anymore?
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel