NICOLA Sturgeon has suggested she would push for a second independence referendum even if the UK remained in the European Union.
The First Minister, who has used Brexit to justify plans for a referendum by May 2021, indicated that she still wanted a vote on independence following a hypothetical People’s Vote to keep the UK in the EU.
Appearing on the Andrew Marr Show, she argued that the prospect of Boris Johnson becoming prime minister, and “all of the experience of the last three years”, mean Scotland should be able to have another independence vote.
Presenter Marr asked: “If you get a second referendum on Brexit, that you want, and it goes the other way – the UK stays inside the EU – does that remove the need for an imminent Scottish independence referendum?”
The First Minister replied: “Not necessarily, no, because I think things are changing.”
She added: “I’m sure if we end up in that scenario I’ll come back on the programme and we could talk about that rather than talk about it hypothetically just now.
“We could be facing the prospect in the near future of Boris Johnson as prime minister, so the last thing I should be doing is narrowing Scotland’s options.
READ MORE: Scots Tories set to ditch Operation Arse and back Boris
“I think after all of the experience of the last three years, Scotland should have the opportunity to decide whether we want to become an independent European nation.”
READ MORE: What sort of Prime Minister would Boris Johnson make?
In April, Sturgeon told the Scottish Parliament that she wants to hold a second referendum on independence by 2021 if the UK is taken out of the EU.
The Scottish Government is due to introduce a Referendum Bill this month setting out the rules of a second vote.
During or after the passage of the legislation the First Minister has said she will request the temporary transfer of powers from Westminster to Holyrood to hold the vote. She has also suggested she would favour having a new independence referendum next year.
The Scottish Greens have previously said they are in favour of a second independence referendum even if Brexit does not go ahead – through the revocation of Article 50 or if a People’s Vote resulted in a remain outcome.
Speaking to The National earlier this year, Ross Greer, the party’s spokesman on Europe, said a second plebiscite must take place before the next Holyrood election in 2021, and even if the UK does not leave the European Union.
“In the event of a People’s Vote succeeding for remain, there is still clearly a mandate for independence.
“Over the last two and a half years the way Scotland has been treated has run completely contrary to everything we were promised in 2014. We were told to lead the UK, not leave the UK.
“When six Scottish politicians tried to do exactly that with the case to the European Court of Justice to revoke Article 50. When we succeeded in that case… we were treated with contempt by a large section of the political right at Westminster.
He continued: “The Scottish devolution settlement itself has come under direct attack from the UK Government. Everything that has happened has proven the need for Scotland to have that choice again over our own future.”
Scottish Conservative chief whip Maurice Golden accused the First Minister of using Brexit as “a fig leaf to hide her only real priority”.
“Nicola Sturgeon has used Brexit as an excuse for pursuing a second independence referendum for the last three years,” he said.
“Whether the UK is in or out of the EU, her answer will always be the same – independence.”
Golden added: “It is time for Scotland to move on from this endless uncertainty and to leave the division of the last decade behind us.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel