SENIOR Scottish Tories previously hostile to a Boris Johnson premiership are reportedly softening their position.
Last year Scottish members of the party were at the heart of a campaign, nicknamed “Operation Arse”, to prevent the former foreign secretary becoming party leader. At the time, private polling indicated Johnson had abysmal approval ratings in Scotland.
Some senior Scottish Tories remain of the view that Johnson as prime minister would be “a gift to the SNP” and potentially the midwife of independence, with many liberal voters switching to the “Yes” side.
However, with polls suggesting a dismal result for the Tories in this week’s European elections, with many Leave voters switching to Nigel Farage’s Brexit Party, some Scottish Tory parliamentarians believe Johnson – the favourite of the Tory grassroots – is their best hope.
READ MORE: First Minister may push for indyref2 even if the UK remains in the EU
Over the weekend comments about Johnson by Scottish Secretary David Mundell suggested his own previous criticisms of Johnson’s were diminishing.
At the Tory party conference last October, Mundell said Johnson was not “an asset” to the party and accused his former Cabinet colleague of trying to create “a maximum amount of distraction and headlines for himself”.
A few months later he suggested he could not serve in Johnson Cabinet.
Asked in December if he would remain in the Cabinet if Johnson replaced May in No 10, the Scottish Secretary said: “Given my views about Mr Johnson, which are well known, that would be extremely difficult.
He added: “Mr Johnson and I don’t agree on a whole range of issues and I don’t see myself being able to serve in that way.”
But at the end of last week Mundell appeared to have changed his mind, accusing the SNP of demonising Johnson.
He told The Herald: “I’m not accepting this nationalist demonising of him...”
The paper also reported that the Scottish Secretary has not ruled himself out of serving in a Johnson Cabinet.
With Johnson favourite for the Tory leadership, one Conservative MSP said he would give the party a better chance of holding onto its Scottish seats.
“He would be able to win back any votes lost to Farage over Brexit,” the MSP told the Sunday Times.
Another Tory MSP insisted, however: “Boris would be a gift to the SNP.”
Others say Johnson’s election would cause difficulties for Davidson, who has had a strained relationship with him.
Meanwhile, it has also emerged Scottish Tories will quiz Johnson on his pro-Union credentials as part of his bids to replace Theresa May.
The Mail on Sunday reported that there are plans to test all the candidates for No 10 on how they would oppose independence.
Environment Secretary Michael Gove is also expected to stand. Fellow Scot, International Development Secretary Rory Stewart, has already thrown his hat into the ring.
Scottish Tory leader Ruth Davidson has yet to back a candidate but invited Gove and Home Secretary Sajid Javid to speak at the recent Scottish Tory conference. She did not invite Johnson.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel