GEORGE Kerevan hit on a subject that has worried me for a good while (SNP cannot afford to ignore Labour’s popularity among young Scots voters, November 19). As a middle-aged man going to Green Party meetings, it has struck me how old we the attendees are.
One problem that the SNP and Greens have is the false premise that Labour are a radical party working for the downtrodden. This is obviously false (Glasgow pay scandal), but brand image can go a long way. Another problem is that the SNP and Greens look and act like the Unionist establishment that they should exist to overthrow.
In order for the independence parties and the wider non-party indy movement to win through to independence we need to move beyond established politics.
We need to get into schools, colleges, universities, sport clubs, unions, workplaces and everywhere else that people congregate. We also need to be deep into the online territory where young people live so much of their lives.
Playing by the rules of established politics will never get us to independence. The UK is crumbling around us, and it’s time to get dirty.
“Yes then, Yes now, Yes always.”
Jon Southerington
Deerness, Orkney
ANDY Anderson fails to see any logic in standing Green candidates in constituency seats where they have no chance of winning (Letters, November 19). Perfectly sensible when you look at the votes that were cast for Edinburgh Central in the 2016 election – if every Green vote had gone to the SNP instead, the SNP would have won the seat and Ruth Davidson would be out. But when you also consider the list vote, if Ruth Davidson had lost the constituency seat, the Conservative list votes would have been weighted higher. And when I run the Lothian numbers through my calculator, that would give the last list seat to the Conservatives. As it was, Andy Wightman of the Greens got the last list seat.
Steve Stanton
Milnathort
MANY correspondents in The National’s letter pages have correctly alluded to the very public and cavernous wounds within the Tory government, and Tory party for that matter, regarding the political convulsions over the withdrawal from the EU. This presents a range of opportunities for the wider Yes movement to state its case, and it is not in any way impossible that the Tory party could split over the question of Brexit. History shows that political parties can and do fracture over issues that the faithful feel are central to their particular ideology. For example, in 1886 the Liberals split over the question of Irish Home Rule while in 1931 Labour split over the first manifestation of austerity policies.
Worryingly, the current SNP leadership seem to be quite willing to dismiss more than one million Scots who have been long-term supporters of independence, myself included, who voted Leave in 2016. It’s almost as if the loss of 21 seats at the 2017 Westminster elections did not happen, but assuredly it did, and fundamentally because up to 35% of SNP/Yes supporters voted Leave in 2016, and in 2017 many of these same voters did not defect but simply stayed at home, so uninspired were they by a rabidly pro-EU message.
The SNP paid a high political price for this tactical dyslexia as seats like Gordon and Moray were not so much won by the Tories as gifted to them by the SNP leadership. The party has, to my knowledge, never rescinded a longstanding conference commitment to a referendum on EU membership post-independence. Rather than link the very question of independence to the pro-austerity and undemocratic EU, surely a unifying rallying cry for the whole Yes movement, in all its shades, would be to go for EFTA/EEA status? This would leave the question of full EU membership to a post-independence Scottish Government and keep the wider Yes movement united.
Councillor Andy Doig
Renfrewshire Council
KATHLEEN Nutt’s article, ‘Sturgeon blasts “outrageous” Tory claim she cancelled Cabinet Office meeting’ (November 17) was correct in highlighting this arrogant attitude by David Lidington.
However, I think The National missed the opportunity to expose his major comment on BBC News at Six on Friday, November 16, when he blamed the SNP if the Brexit deal failed in the Commons. I would also consider the item was typical of the BBC broadcasting these issues at primetime news programmes. Very little detail about what David Lidington discussed with Scottish business leaders in the news item – now that would have been interesting and newsworthy.
George Adam
Linlithgow
IN amongst the chaos that is Brexit, the one thing of note is the very poor standard of politicking. It is despairing to hear and see so many politicians who lack integrity, intelligence and “the right stuff” to guide us through these troubled times. It is evident that of all the high-profile players in this “game”, Nicola Sturgeon continues to be Scotland’s and, dare I say it, the UK’s outstanding example of how to serve her country and the electorate.
Keith Taylor
via email
YOUR correspondent from Kilmaurs (Letters, November 17) dubbed our fusionless PM, rather aptly, a “broken reed”. If only the Leader of the Opposition had anything of substance to offer, he would be in a uniquely favourable position to challenge the vulnerable Mrs May. Alas, any opposition has failed to materialise. One is minded of the rhyme:
As I was coming down the stair
I met a man who wasn’t there.
He wasn’t there again today
I wish that man would go away.
While Theresa’s a broken reed, Corby’s a rubber crutch.
James Stevenson
Auchterarder
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here