GORDON McIntyre-Kemp is correct in his inspiring article (It’s by overcoming people’s fear of change that we’ll win indyref2, The National, December 29), which brings to mind the famous quote by the French philosopher Voltaire: “It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere.”
I profoundly dislike Voltaire’s use of the term “fools” in this context, and instead prefer to think that there are people who are yet to be persuaded that Scotland should choose independence. It is not surprising that some people fear change, and want to cling on to what they know best.
To overcome this inertia we need to deliver a positive message that independence will make a real difference to the lives of the people who live in Scotland. We must show the undecided exactly how this will be achieved, because many people still have no idea what real differences it can actually make.
One example is the full control over our economy we will have using our own central bank and currency, enabling us to raise finance to help pay for infrastructure investment like transport and communication improvements. This can only be done when Scotland becomes independent.
All of us in the wider Yes movement need to embrace the fact that we are a broad church and that we all have something to bring to the table, united by the common goal of independence. Personally, I applaud the fact that we have groups as diverse as Radical Independence and the Scottish Yes Tories; SNP and Labour for Indy; Scottish Socialist Party and the Scottish Greens.
Wouldn’t it be fantastic to have a government of national unity in our first independent parliament – where ALL politicians will, in their own ways, be governing exclusively for the benefit of Scotland.
Peter Hynd
Paisley
IN reply to Gordon MacIntyre-Kemp’s column arguing for a “conservative with a small c” Yes campaign, I couldn’t disagree more. Businessman Kemp wants to attach our demands for independence to the same old stale politics which has dirtied Westminster and Holyrood, thus rendering the whole reason for independence redundant. Arguing for the status quo – Scotland inside the EU – and no more will alienate the people who independence should be for: Scotland’s working-class majority who are struggling to get by. Many of these Scots voted to leave the EU in 2016 in the hope it would bring some sort of change.
The Scottish Socialist Party believes independence should be for transformational change – because that’s how we’ll win a majority and because otherwise what’s the point? Independence can be a vehicle for abolishing poverty wages, lowering bills, building council houses, funding public services and so much more. For a modern democratic republic which protects communities from profiteering. We should set out a different vision than to compete with the low-tax, low-wages and fat-cat-friendly neoliberal European powerhouses whose punishing austerity we seek to escape.
Alas, there are Tartan Tories in our ranks who wish to see Edinburgh become a new London. Workers have paid the price before for putting our faith in the hands of businessmen. Thankfully independence doesn’t belong to Kemp, Sturgeon or the SNP. It belongs to all of us who have picked up the baton from those activists who went before. Don’t let it be for nothing.
Hugh Cullen
SSP Executive Committee Member
I SO enjoyed Gordon’s article. Fear is what lost us our referendum in 2014 and we need to tackle peoples’ fears head on. It is a good question to ask when in discussion about our independence: “What are you afraid of?” As a starting point the answers will help us to provide the information they require and will help those of us who are already committed to independence to support those who in reality are bereft of good clear information. I have lived my life by the slogan of “Feel the fear, and do it anyway!”
With fear comes excitement but if we give in to fear we remain stuck and unfulfilled, and it will always have us on the run. “There’s nout tae fear but fear itself.” Please folks, get excited about our wonderful country and how we can become trailblazers for a future where things can and will be done better!
Lucille Henderson
Milnathort
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel