The consequences for Westminster following a decision by an independent Scottish government for the removal of Trident missiles from Scotland are huge. Essentially the Westminster government have nowhere in the r UK that can accommodate Trident. Any possible deployment would be unacceptable to the civilian population concerned. If we in Scotland were asked now instead of what happened in the 1960s to use Faslane as a base for the deployment of Trident imagine the public outcry. Any suitable site in the rest of the British Isles would surely result in a similar outcry.
What this means in effect is that the British nuclear deterrent would cease to exist in any practical, meaningful way. In turn this affects Westminster and British nationalism in a fundamental manner.
THE current possession of Faslane and the associated nuclear deterrent supports British foreign policy in a number of areas – eg, a seat on the UN security council. Witness the posturing over Brexit and the apparent nostalgia for the “good old days of Empire”. Remove the nuclear arsenal and the very concept of the role of Britain on the world stage is laid open to question.
In the spirit of “know your enemy” I raise this as an issue to alert Yes campaigners to the potential reaction of British nationalism to what could be construed as an existential threat to everything that they hold dear.
Make no mistake, the British state will use every argument in its repertoire to discredit notions of nuclear disarmament and by extension the denial of the use of Faslane as a base for Trident.
These arguments will range from job losses, local employment through to the defence of the realm. Underpinning this likely response will be their recognition of a fundamental threat to Britain’s role in the world. They will not give this up without a fight. Expect a noisy, protracted, unpleasant and potentially dirty campaign from British Nationalists.
There is nothing potentially more dangerous than a cornered and frightened adversary. We must be prepared and ready for the coming storm of abuse, misinformation, appeals to false patriotism and potential ’dirty tricks’ that will undoubtedly come our way in the near future.
Tom Ward
Forfar
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel