WE must note that the surge from Tory unknowns to have “God save...” resurrected has a hidden purpose.
There will be a new “whom” added at some time, namely, “King”, the present heir and then the next scions in line. The oiks need to be retrained in seeing the Queen’s successors as monarch. Whatever myths of selfless service surround the present monarch and monarchy, one must surely have concerns about Charles given his not-so-acceptable persona and past actions. There is an investigation into aspects of his charity monies and suspicions over cash for favours. The idea of the selfless, constitutional monarchy reigning but not ruling has been shown to be a lie, in line with the daily lies perpetrated by the present Her Majesty’s government and PM.
READ MORE: ITV publish leaked email showing No 10 staff invited to party mid-lockdown
The current Windsor “firm” is truly in inner turmoil, hardly models of personal rectitude we are ordered to look up to, and whose family feuds resemble a mere soap opera. The daily press briefings reveal the inner family squabbles as well as the drip-fed propaganda which are taken up by other media and “royal” watchers.
This upsurge in redoing the monarchist anthem has a hidden agenda. Beware!
John Edgar
Kilmaurs
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel