THE most senior Catholic Church leader to be charged with sexual abuse came close to confronting his accusers yesterday in a video-linked Australian court hearing to test the strength of the prosecution’s case.
Cardinal George Pell’s alleged victims began testifying in the Melbourne Magistrates Court against Pope Francis’s former finance minister in testimony that cannot be made public.
But the complainants, who cannot be identified, are avoiding media scrutiny and the company of their alleged abuser by giving their evidence via video.
The number of alleged victims has not been made public, and their testimony is scheduled to continue for up to two weeks.
The 76-year-old Australian cardinal has denied any wrongdoing and has foreshadowed pleas of not guilty if the committal hearing that is likely to run as long as a month finds there is sufficient evidence to warrant a jury trial.
Pell was charged last June with sexually abusing multiple people in his Australian home state of Victoria.
The details of the allegations have yet to be released to the public, though police have described the charges as historical sexual assault offences.
Pell was archbishop of Melbourne before he progressed to archbishop of Sydney. He then moved to the Vatican as a prefect of the church’s economy ministry in 2014.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here