David Warner’s manager has claimed his client “protected Cricket Australia” over the 2018 sandpaper scandal, claiming the ball-tampering plot ran deeper than the three players who were sanctioned.
Warner, Steve Smith and Cameron Bancroft were the only individuals punished for the incident, which took place at Newlands during a bitter series against South Africa and caused a huge political stir Down Under.
The episode has resurfaced in recent weeks, with Warner initially attempting to overturn a lifetime ban on captaining the national side only to abandon his appeal with an angry statement that accused the review panel of seeking a “public lynching”.
Now, against the backdrop of the Adelaide Test against the West Indies, his adviser James Erskine has upped the stakes by suggesting knowledge of the tampering was wider-ranging and longer-standing than previously thought.
“You’d have to be a blind Black Labrador…there was far more than three people involved in this thing, they all got a canning and David Warner was completely villainised,” Erskine told Melbourne’s SEN Radio.
“He has shut up, he protected Cricket Australia, he protected his fellow players on my advice, because at the end of the day no-one wanted to hear any more of it and he’s got on playing cricket. The truth will come out, let me tell you.
“There’s lots of people. There’s two cricketers who put their hands up and said at the time, ‘Why don’t we all just tell the truth, they can’t fire all of us’. That’s what happened.”
Erskine suggested the origins of the sandpaper drama dated back to an earlier series against the Proteas in 2016, adding: “Two senior executives were in the changing room in Hobart and basically were berating the team for losing against South Africa and Warner said ‘we’ve got to reverse-swing the ball. The only way we can reverse-swing the ball is by tampering with it’. They were told to do it.”
In between the two South Africa series, Australia won the 2017-18 Ashes 4-0. The PA news agency has contacted Cricket Australia for a response.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here