Sean Dyche revealed Burnley’s thrifty disposition at the start of 2014 meant they turned down the chance to sign James Tarkowski for £300,000 – before paying around £5million for the defender two years later.
Tarkowski was at Oldham when he came on to Dyche’s radar but the long-serving Burnley manager’s attempts to convince the board to sign the defender seven years ago were rejected at a time of heavy cost-cutting at the club.
Burnley were in the middle of a campaign that would see them promoted back to the Premier League at the time but Tarkowski went to Sky Bet League One club Brentford before Dyche got his man for a much larger fee at the beginning of 2016.
“I did try to get him from Oldham and the board wouldn’t give me £300,000 at the time, we ended up paying £5million, go and figure that one out,” Dyche said ahead of Burnley’s trip to Fulham on Monday evening.
“When I got (the manager’s job at Burnley), the remit was to bring money in, cut costs, not spend anything or very little. Reality-bound at the time. I know it sounds crazy now but I was really pushing to bring James in here.
“The club had put so much into trying to stay in the Premier League then to try to get back in the Premier League and when I got it, they were cutting virtually everything. We couldn’t stump up £300,000 so he went to Brentford.
“I think he really wanted to come and certainly his agent implied strongly that he really wanted to come here. It shows a massive shift in this club but at the time £300,000 was deemed too much.
“That was the reality then and that was where the club was at, so I just managed it the best I could and we carried on. Eventually when I got the chance to go and get him and we had a bit more money then we went and got him.”
Even at the inflated fee, Tarkowski is still regarded as a shrewd purchase as – following the departure of Michael Keane to Everton in the summer of 2017 – he has gone on to form a dependable centre-back partnership with Ben Mee.
Tarkowski’s future at the start of this season was up in the air, with bids of £30million from both Leicester and West Ham declined, although Dyche reiterated that every player at Burnley has a price.
However, as the club were taken over by Delaware-based investment firm ALK Capital at the start of this year, Dyche believes they are on a stronger footing to turn down bids that they do not feel match their own valuation.
“I think there will be a bit more strength financially (under the new ownership) in what we’re trying to achieve and with contracts and that sort of thing,” Dyche added.
“But there’s still a model at this club where if someone hits that number and it’s deemed appropriate then it’s likely that some players go from this club.
“There was a time when we had to take that money, well we haven’t had to take that money. There is no need to take that money so we could keep players here and keep them competitive with our group.
“That’s probably the strength that’s been achieved here over the years financially where we can’t always keep them forever but we can fend off bids if we’re being lowballed or they’re not good enough.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here