Internal ‘England versus England’ warm-up matches are being considered to help the country’s top players get back up to speed in the event of an end to cricket’s current lockdown.
The summer programme is currently suspended until May 28 due to the coronavirus pandemic, with the first international match still pencilled in for a week later.
In reality nobody expects the first Test between England and the West Indies to take place at the Oval as planned, particularly given the amount of physical conditioning that would need to be completed before players were ready for the rigours of five-day cricket.
Ashley Giles, managing director of men’s cricket at the England and Wales Cricket Board, is well aware of the work that must be done and is a proponent of intra-squad friendlies as a possible solution.
“From a playing point of view I think we’ll need to play a couple of warm-up games (before a Test match),” he said.
“They could be behind closed doors, they could be among England players – none of us really know until we get there. I think that would be a decent idea or a decent way around a problem if we weren’t playing cricket more broadly. I think we could do that.
“Believe me, we will do whatever we can, as long as our people are safe, to get out there and play cricket.”
Australia adopted a similar method to help narrow down selection ahead of last summer’s Ashes, while back in 2010 England were turned over in a Twenty20 practice match by their own second string in Abu Dhabi.
Batsmen Michael Lumb and Craig Kieswetter caught the eye, earned promotion to the senior team and helped the side become T20 world champions within a matter of months.
It is not yet clear whether England would play a Test team against a shadow XI or mix Test and limited-overs specialists to get as many of their contracted personnel on the pitch.
Giles, meanwhile, suggested any of the 18 county headquarters and the ECB’s performance centre at Loughborough could act as host venue.
It could also prove a helpful exercise if England are forced into running two parallel squads – one red ball, one white ball – to fulfil fixtures in a truncated season.
“If we have to do that we will. We have certainly looked at playing two formats around the same time,” he said.
“You could have a Test match running and play a T20 or an ODI the day before or the day after a Test match. We have got enough depth where we can split our resources but we haven’t got that far.
“Whilst it may not be ideal from a playing point of view, in the long run it might give us a better look at other players and a broader group of people that we might have to play in the future. In that sense it might be an opportunity.
“As much as I fight the players’ side, there is a bigger picture and we are going to have to be flexible as everyone else.”
Giles admitted contingency planning was well under way for alterations to an international schedule that also includes series against Pakistan, Australia and Ireland in addition to the West Indies.
“The deadline of May 28 still stands but it’s looking less and less likely that we’re going to be out there in June. We have to look at alternatives,” he said.
“We are looking at scenarios where we can push those matches back as far as possible without losing any cricket. Whether eventually games start falling off the calendar right now we don’t know – the experts don’t know when we might be clear – so we are preparing schedules and scenarios.
“If we can’t get it all, it’s really important we work in partnership with all the other boards. It is really important we work with them doing what we can to fulfil those fixtures but with a priority on keeping people safe.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here