Billy Joe Saunders has apologised on social media for the second time in two weeks after a video emerged of him offering advice to men on how to physically assault their female partners during the coronavirus lockdown.
The 30-year-old is no stranger to controversy and here the PA news agency looks back at the occasions when his actions away from the ring have hit the headlines.
August 2008
Saunders was suspended by the Amateur Boxing Association for allegedly lewd behaviour towards a woman in the team hotel in France during a camp ahead of the 2008 Beijing Olympics. Saunders turned professional four months later.
September 2018
The British Board of Boxing Control fined Saunders £100,000 and issued him with a severe reprimand about his future conduct after video footage emerged of him appearing to offer a woman drugs. Saunders’ actions were filmed from his car and seemingly showed him offering £150 worth of drugs to the woman to perform a sex act, as well as asking her to punch a passer-by, which she did, before he drove off.
October 2018
Saunders vacated his WBO middleweight title to challenge the decision to deny him a licence to fight Demetrius Andrade. Saunders was refused a licence for the fight because of an adverse finding in a Voluntary Anti-Doping Association (VADA) test that took place in August 2018.
20 March 2020
Saunders posted a video on Twitter in which he said he was “embarrassed” for any offence caused after he called an airline to say a friend was displaying coronavirus symptoms, causing him to be removed from the flight along with Saunders’ trainer Ben Davison and stablemate Josh Taylor. The friend subsequently tested negative for Covid-19.
28 March 2020
The WBO super middleweight champion apologised after a video emerged of him giving advice to men on how to hit their female partners if tempers flared during the coronavirus lockdown. The 30-year-old, who was working out on a punch bag in a barn, talked about how to react if “your old woman is giving you mouth” and “she’s coming at you, spitting a bit of venom in your face”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here