Duncan Scott refused to acknowledge gold medallist Sun Yang after claiming a share of bronze in the men’s 200m freestyle at the World Aquatics Championship in Gwangju.
The Chinese swimmer – who has previously served a doping ban – won the title only after his rival Danas Rapsys, who touched home first in one minute 45.78 seconds, was belatedly disqualified for a false start.
Scott, who dead-heated with Russia’s Martin Malyutin behind silver medallist Katsuhiro Matsumoto of Japan – observed the national anthem but then stepped off the podium and refused to engage with Sun.
On Monday, Australian Mack Horton refused to share the podium with Sun after taking silver behind the Chinese swimmer in the men’s 400m freestyle event.
Aside from his previous drugs ban, Sun currently faces a hearing at the Court of Arbitration for Sport over a decision to clear him of a further doping offence, and many of his rivals believe he should not be competing.
Having ignored Horton’s gesture, Sun appeared more animated by Scott’s stance, turning and appearing to mouth something towards the 22-year-old as they left the stage.
The bronze medal was the fourth of Scott’s career and his first in an individual event, having earned gold as part of the 4x200m freestyle relay squad in both 2015 and 2017.
As they had the previous day with Horton, governing body FINA issued a statement saying they had sent warning letters to both Scott and Yang regarding their conduct.
After a meeting of its executive board, FINA found both swimmers “guilty of inadequate behaviour on this occasion, which is not acceptable in accordance with the FINA Constitution Rule C 12.1.3”.
British Swimming was not immediately available to comment on Scott’s sanction.
Adam Peaty cruised into the final of the men’s 50m breaststroke.
One day after picking up his third consecutive 100m crown, Peaty beat his nearest rivals by over half a second as he finished in 26.11 seconds.
Peaty will hope to go close to his own 50m world record of 25.95secs – which he set in 2017 in Budapest – in the final on Wednesday.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here