Juventus’ decision to play in the International Champions Cup in Asia instead of the United States was not made to specifically avoid potential difficulties with Cristiano Ronaldo.
A report claimed the Serie A side will not play pre-season games in the USA due to the ongoing enquiries into a rape allegation made against the Portugal international.
It had been suggested competition organisers made a choice to keep Juve out of America to avoid the risk of Ronaldo being detained by the authorities as part of the investigation into the allegations in Las Vegas – which the player denies.
Press Association Sport understands a decision was made by Juventus several months ago to tour the Far East to spread their exposure after successive summers in the USA and not in relation to Ronaldo’s case.
Three of their last four appearances in the competition have been in America, the other was in Australia in 2016, and it is understood club officials view the switch as a “normal change” over a three-year period.
Two months after Ronaldo made his £99million move from Real Madrid the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department announced it had reopened an investigation into accusations by an American woman that Ronaldo raped her in 2009 and later paid £285,000 for her silence.
In a social media post Ronaldo claimed it was “fake news” and his lawyers have repeatedly denied the claims.
In October Juventus issued a statement in which they said: “Ronaldo has shown in recent months his great professionalism and dedication, which is appreciated by everyone at Juventus.
“The events allegedly dating back to almost 10 years ago do not change this opinion, which is shared by anyone who has come into contact with this great champion.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here