Former England striker Michael Owen is “very surprised” Marcus Rashford has been left out of manager Gareth Southgate’s Euro 2024 plans.
Manchester United forward Rashford was one of two high-profile, experienced omissions from Southgate’s initial 33-man training squad for this summer’s tournament along with former Liverpool captain Jordan Henderson.
Rashford’s exclusion comes after a frustrating season in which he scored just eight goals in 42 appearances in all competitions for United.
Owen, who netted 40 goals for his country in 89 appearances, wrote on X: “Very surprised Gareth Southgate has left @MarcusRashford out of his squad.
“Granted he’s had a poor season by his standards but tournament football is different and he’s always been confident in an England shirt.
“We’ve many talented attacking players but very few with Rashford’s pace. In such a big squad, he was worth the risk.”
Owen’s thoughts were echoed by another former England attacker in Paul Merson, who feels Rashford’s experience could have made a big difference.
Merson told Sky Sports News: “I’m really shocked. I know people will say he hasn’t been good but tournament football is so, so different.
“I would have taken him, 100 per cent. I don’t know what’s going on in the lad’s life but, as a player, he’s played in tournaments before and that’s so important. Tournament football is like no other football.
“I think you lose pace, you lose goals and he’s scored goals in tournaments. He can play on the wing, he can play up front.
“He’s one of those hot players. He can be freezing cold, don’t get me wrong – but when the lad catches fire and he’s hot, he’s unplayable. And that’s what you need to win tournaments.”
Dion Dublin, another former England striker, backed Southgate’s decisions, however.
Dublin told BBC Radio 5 Live: “In the situation, I think he’s picked incredibly well, I really do.
“Yes, he’s having to leave some behind but I think this is his most attacking and positive squad that he’s picked so far.
“I’m in Gareth’s corner here because I think he’s done a great job.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel