Brendan Rodgers has been hit with a two-game ban after a Scottish FA disciplinary hearing.
The Celtic manager had been cited by the authorities after his furious comments on refereeing "incompetence" in Celtic's loss to Hearts.
The Northern Irishman will miss the weekend's match against Livingston - but will be back in the dugout for his side's crucial away clash at Rangers a week later.
That's because one of the games is suspended between now and the end of the season.
The decision has just broken following a hearing at Hampden.
Rodgers had launched a scathing verdict on the officials as he blasted the decision to send off Yang for a high boot before Tomoki Iwata was penalised for handball leading to a penalty.
Rodgers was charged under Rule No72 Article 96.1 which states: “No recognised football body, club, official, team official under the jurisdiction of the Scottish FA, shall in an interview or in any other manner calculated or likely to lead to publicity (i) criticise the decision(s) and/or performance(s) of any or all match official(s) in such a way as to indicate bias or incompetence on the part of such match official.”
Rodgers could have faced anything between a two-game to 20-match ban with the club also facing a potential fine of between £1,000 to £100,000.
In an explosive post-match interview Rodgers had blasted the officials for "incompetence" as he branded the refereeing and VAR use in the match as the worst he'd seen.
Asked if the match was as bad as he's seen in Scotland, regarding the officials, the Irishman said: “I think so.
“I try to respect decisions and give the benefit of the doubt. But I think when I see that level of incompetence, which is the only word I can use, then that makes me worry for the game.
“In such a tight title race that can make the difference. I also think that VAR is not the problem here. That’s clear. It’s competence.
“I think the first one is a great example of the game being refereed outside of the pitch. The referee made the decision and someone outside made another decision to say it was a sending off.
“That’s the game being refereed outside of the field and in big games that costs you.
“I’m not one who comes crying about referees, be it here or the English Premier League because I understand there will be mistakes made.
“But that today was awful officiating in what was a big game for us. My feeling is that the game was decided by the officials - on the field and outside of the field.
“The first one is the sending off when there is no force. Show a still image of that and of course and you will see a foot up with the head near it, but it’s not the reality of the move.
“Don got it actually right on the field. It was a high boot, so it’s a yellow card – no malice or force.
“For John Beaton to actually look at that in VAR, supposedly under no pressure, and say that was sending off? I find that incredible.
“The second one is worse. If you have a penalty go against you for that then there will be penalties every single weekend and midweek."
MORE TO FOLLOW.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel