GLASGOW United FC have said they will support footballer and rapist David Goodwillie, adding that "this witch hunt has gone on for far too long".
The ex-Scotland internationalist was spotted playing for the Shettleston-based club in a friendly match earlier this month despite a civil court ruling that he raped a woman in 2011.
It led to Glasgow City Council leader Susan Aitken threatening to bar the club from its training facility.
Glasgow United haven’t yet signed Goodwillie, but defended playing him. They told BBC Scotland: "David Goodwillie has never been charged for this offence.
"He has no criminal record and has never appeared on any offenders' register.
"How can he show contrite or remorse for something he staunchly claims he did not do."
In 2017, Goodwillie was found by a civil court to have raped a woman and was ordered to pay £100,000 in damages.
Goodwillie has seen several football club contracts collapse due to public outrage over the case, most recently by Australian team FC Sorrento.
READ MORE: David Goodwillie gives first interview since rape ruling
The city council released a statement from leader Aitken on Sunday which said: "David Goodwillie has been found, in court, to be a rapist. However, in more than 12 years, he has never once shown any kind of contrition or remorse.
"Any club that signs him is making a very clear statement about its attitude to the safety of women and girls - both in sport and in its community.
"It would be an outrageous decision, wholly at odds with how community facilities like Greenfield should be run.
"I've asked officers to look at the council's agreement with Glasgow United and made it clear that I'm ready for the city to walk away."
A Glasgow United spokesperson added: "We play home matches at our own ground nearby like we have for the last 120 years.
"We do a lot of work in our community helping those in need and this is only an extension of that work.
"We could easily walk away from this like every other club before us but we won't.
"We are supporting David with his mental health and will continue to do so.
"This witch hunt has gone on for far too long and the use of any person's life as a political football is unacceptable."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel