MIDDLESBROUGH have taken a social media swipe at Celtic as the English Championship club announced the signing of Riley McGree.
Chris Wilder sealed a deal to sign the Australian midfielder, 23, after the player had held talks with Celtic.
Ange Postecoglou confirmed initial discussions had taken place over a move for McGree before he "decided to look elsewhere".
But the Celtic boss also suggested a deal was ruled out as he insisted he wouldn't convince a player to join the club if they don't want to be there.
Middlesbrough swooped in to sign McGree and aimed a cheeky dig at Celtic over the transfer talks in a message on Twitter.
Referencing Celtic as they shared a snap on Twitter, a Middlesbrough post read: "We've gone for the away kit celebration shot this time.
"Some people prefer red to green, but hey ho... #UTB"
Wilder himself hit out at some speculation over the deal to take McGree to the Riverside as he blasted reports he splashed the cash to gazump Celtic.
He commented: “There is a lot of nonsense being written which I need to get to the bottom of in terms of blowing other clubs out of the water with fees and in terms of wages.
“That’s not just with Riley, that’s with Flo [Balogun] and with Aaron Connolly too.
We've gone for the away kit celebration shot this time 🟢📸
— Middlesbrough FC (@Boro) January 14, 2022
Some people prefer red to green, but hey ho... 😉 #UTB pic.twitter.com/t7LeooyYI0
“We’ve been into these players for a while now and we’ve understood the deals and situations, and as happens, these boys have other clubs coming in for them.
“But genuinely, if you ask those three players where they wanted to come and where they wanted to be, they’ve got their opinion.
“You can say, of course they’re going to say that, but I genuinely believe they do want to be here, especially in Riley’s case.
“I’ve known about him for a while and it speaks volumes about the hard work we put in.
“I don’t believe they’re coming because of a financial point of view. We are competitive and we have been competitive, but I think there are a lot of other things that have swayed why these boys have wanted to come here."
Postecoglou had said: “I had a discussion with him and then he obviously decided he wanted to take an opportunity elsewhere, which is fine. It wasn’t really anything too drastic for us.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel