Jack Carlin was spent, legs numb, brain fried, every joule of energy left out on the track. All he had left at the end of his day’s work was a bundle of emotion in one hand and a pocketful of joy coloured bronze. The 24-year-old weaved his best Paisley pattern and left Russian Denis Dmitriev thoroughly stitched up, a 2-0 victor in their tete-a-tete for third place in the men’s individual sprint, the decisive triumph secured by the sliver of 15-hundredths of one second.
A title lost, in one sense. The UK’s monopoly on this crown, which had stretched back to Chris Hoy in Beijing in 2008, gone Dutch with Harrie Lavreysen, Carlin’s conqueror in the semi-finals, snatching gold from compatriot Jeffrey Hoogland in the last of their best of three by +0.208 secs to supplement the team sprint title spirited across the North Sea just a few days before.
The only legacy Carlin must really add to, however, is his own. “I'm pretty proud to be fair,” he stated. “It's been a long year.” Quite a transformation within, improving technique and accelerating speed but also restoring his inner belief following the 20th place finish he contrived to claim at the 2020 world championships that threw a spanner right into his spokes.
In Japan, he has inherited the majestic mantle of the dethroned Jason Kenny. No easy burden. High bar, lofty standards, established previously by Hoy. Still small but critical improvements, Carlin senses, they can be made to body and mind.
“I think I’m still learning every race and I would say that if I’d gone into the semi with the same aggressiveness and confidence I did in every single other race I might have won,” he reflected.
“I came off after that and I was angry with myself. I just let my guard down a little bit and I suffered for it and lost the two semi-final rounds - to be fair, an unbelievable rider, because you have to be on you’re A-game against the two Dutch lads because they’re the best in the world, without a shadow of a doubt.
“But I switched it back on. I got a real slap across the back of the head and told ‘get your head in it’. I came out fighting and the main thing to take away is that if you have the belief you can go anywhere with it.”
Silver before, then bronze here. One more assault lurks in this weekend’s keirin. At that prospect, his eyes lit up and the battery was suddenly on recharge. “The confidence is there, the legs are there,” he insisted. “I'll get a good night's sleep tonight, reset the brain for tomorrow. There's only one colour missing now so I need to up my game and see what can happen.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here