Great Britain’s dominance of the men’s four at the Olympic Games came to an end in Tokyo.
The team of Oliver Cook, Matthew Rossiter, Rory Gibbs and Sholto Carnegie failed to win a medal in an event that had ended in British victory at the last five Games, stretching back to the turn of the millennium.
Here, the PA news agency looks back at Great Britain’s winning run in the competition.
Sydney 2000
Steve Redgrave entered Olympic history by winning his fifth consecutive gold medal alongside Matthew Pinsent, Tim Foster and James Cracknell. A thrilling race saw the British crew win by less than half a second ahead of their closest rivals Italy at Penrith Lakes. It was Pinsent’s third successive Olympic gold and a first for Foster and Cracknell.
Athens 2004
Pinsent claimed his fourth gold medal as Britain pipped world champions Canada. Pinsent and fellow Sydney champion James Cracknell, along with Ed Coode and Steve Williams, won by the narrowest of margins. The Canadian crew cranked up the pressure in the final stages but the GB four dug deep to edge them out in a photo finish by 0.08 seconds, while Italy took bronze.
Beijing 2008
Williams was joined by Tom James, Pete Reed and Andrew Triggs Hodge as the Brits made it a hat-trick of golds in China. They came from a length down on the Australian crew with 500m remaining to triumph by half a length.
London 2012
Britain took gold four for the fourth successive Games as Reed, Triggs Hodge, James and Alex Gregory edged out Australia again at Eton Dorney. Roared on by a capacity home crowd, they blasted out of the blocks to lead after 500m and although Australia stayed within a third of a length with 500m to go, Triggs Hodge gave the call to push and the British stormed away.
Rio 2016
Gold number five for Great Britain arrived in style in Rio as Mohamed Sbihi, George Nash, Constantine Louloudis and 2012 winner Gregory edged out Australia once more. Australia pushed their rivals hard again but eventually trailed in 1.83 seconds behind to take another silver, with Italy claiming the bronze.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here