THE Six Nations will decide on Wednesday evening whether Sunday’s match between France and Scotland can go ahead as planned or should be postponed as a result of the growing number of Covid-positive cases within the French camp.
France announced on Monday that five more members of their squad, including captain Charles Ollivon, had tested positive, taking the number of players affected to ten. Head coach Fabien Galthie and three other members of the backroom staff have also tested positive.
A statement from the Championship’s Testing Oversight Group (TOG) said it had been told by a French official that all players who reported to the national training centre on Sunday had been tested on arrival and kept in isolation until their results were known. The five new positive cases - Ollivon, Cyril Baille, Brice Dulin, Peato Mauvaka and Romain Taofifenua - left the centre yesterday and will now isolate for 10 days. That is also the case with those who tested positive last week: Antoine Dupont, Mohamed Haouas, Gabin Villiere, Arthur Vincent and Julien Marchand.
“The rest of the squad, all of whom tested negative, are training with restricted movement and no close contact for the next 48 hours,” the TOG statement continued. “All players and staff will be tested every 24 hours.
“The TOG will reconvene on Wednesday 24 February in the evening to review the situation. A decision on whether the France v Scotland fixture can go ahead will be made at that stage. Ensuring the health and safety of all players and staff is our number one priority.
“Should the decision be that the fixture cannot go ahead, the match will be rescheduled for the earliest possible date. Six Nations would like to wish all affected players, coaches, and support team a speedy recovery.”
France have called up five new players to replace the latest positive cases: Thomas Ramos, who with 14 caps is by far the most experienced of the quintet; the twice-capped Baptiste Pesenti; and three uncapped players, Gaetan Barlot, Cyril Cazeaux and Thierry Paiva. The French squad plan to resume squad training on Wednesday. The Scotland squad, meanwhile, convened today and plan to continue to prepare as normal for a Sunday match at the Stade de France until told otherwise.
The deferral of the decision until Wednesday night reflects the desire of the Six Nations for the game to go ahead as scheduled, while the suggestion that any rescheduling should be at “the earliest possible date” indicates the urge to adhere as closely as practicable to the original schedule for the tournament. It is as yet unclear how many more positive cases would need to be recorded before the tournament organisers decided that a postponement was necessary on health-and-safety grounds, although obviously the greater number of positive cases, the more pressure would be on the organisers to postpone the game.
However, injuries and illness are factors which affect player availability before the vast majority of rugby matches, and there are no universally applicable rules that state a match can or must be postponed when the number of unavailable players goes above a certain level. Earlier this season, Glasgow’s Champions Cup game against Lyon was cancelled after 20 Warriors players had to self-isolate following Covid exposure, a number that meant it was deemed Danny Wilson’s side would be unable to field a team. (Lyon were awarded a 28-0 win, but only because no other date was available to play the game - a factor that does not apply in the case of France v Scotland). But the French national team clearly has far greater potential playing resources available to it than a club side.
If the match is postponed, the earliest possible date for a rescheduling would, in theory, be the following weekend, as no Six Nations games are due to be played then. But that would be fraught with difficulties, with both France and Scotland conceivably raising objections to it going ahead then.
From the French point of view, most if not all of their current Covid cases would not be deemed ready to play again so soon after isolating. In addition, both national squads could find it difficult to have players released to them by their clubs because of World Rugby’s Regulation Nine, which determines which weekends come into the international window. The weekend of 6-7 March is not one of them, meaning French and English clubs would be within their rights to hold on to players such as Finn Russell and Jonny Gray.
Broadcasting schedules and a crowded calendar may make it preferable for the match to take place as soon as possible, but as last year showed, it is perfectly feasible for Six Nations games to go ahead months after their original date. The game between Wales and Scotland was one fixture which went ahead in the autumn after being postponed in March as the pandemic began to take hold - although the postponement was only made after a prolonged insistence by interested parties that the game would go ahead as planned.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here