MARK Dodson has insisted that Scottish Rugby remains financially stable despite a lengthy delay in the publication of the governing body’s annual accounts.
Addressing the second part of the union’s annual general meeting last night, the chief executive said the delay in producing audited figures for the last financial year had been to allow a “restructuring [of] our finances with the bank”. The third and final part of the agm is set to be held next month, by which time audited figures are expected to be released.
“The business is stable and is in the process of securing its medium-term future,” Dodson told the meeting, which was held virtually. “We face ongoing challenges that may obstruct our progress and alter time frames, but Scottish Rugby was a strong business going into this pandemic and will still be a strong business when we come out of this crisis.”
One big reason for Dodson’s relative optimism is the support of venture capital firm CVC, whose agreement with the PRO14 netted £8.38m in the last financial year. The chief executive said that figure had helped Scottish Rugby to record an unaudited post-tax surplus of £2.87m.
Dodson expects the agreement with CVC to be extended to the Six Nations shortly. Scottish Rugby is still waiting to learn if it is to benefit, as England’s RFU has done, from government support.
The main business of the meeting saw member clubs deliver a rebuke to senior management last night by passing two motions in favour of greater transparency at the annual general meeting. The motion by Currie sought to reassert the authority of the SRU Council, an elected body, over how the union is run.
The motion by Glasgow Hawks emphasised the need for greater transparency in decision-making within the organisation. Both motions needed at least two-thirds of the available vote to be passed, and both made it with ease, winning the support of more than 80 per cent.
However, at a subsequent special general meeting called shortly after the agm was adjourned, Biggar’s attempt to be granted promotion to the Premiership was rejected by the membership, winning only 40 per cent of the vote with 46 per cent voting against. That motion would also have needed two-thirds to be passed. Biggar had been crowned champions of National One before the season was ruled null and void as a response to the pandemic.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here