MAX STRYJEK 6: Nothing he could do about the Rangers goals and made a couple of decent saves from range.
CIARON BROWN 6: Kept things simple and competed well , though Hagi gave him problems peeling onto him at times.
JON GUTHRIE 6: Had his hands full with the sharp movement of Defoe, but stuck to his task manfully.
EFE AMBROSE 5: Huge mistake led to opening Rangers goal, undoing what was otherwise a decent enough first-half performance. As has sadly been the hallmark of much of his career.
JULLIEN SERRANO 6: Tried to get forward on left and put in some decent crosses. Has been a really decent acquisition for Livi.
MARVIN BARTLEY 6: Couldn’t shackle the Rangers midfield, but showed decent leadership to steady his team after they fell two behind early in the game.
CRAIG SIBBALD 6: Gave his all and showed good energy to get around the pitch for his side.
NICKY DEVLIN 8: Really good battle with Bassey and fought his corner in determined fashion. Best Livi player by far.
JASON HOLT 6: Former Rangers man tried to get forward and support the attack, but couldn’t influence the game as he would have liked.
SCOTT PITTMAN 7: Almost got a goal as he flicked Serrano’s cross onto the post, and was Livi’s biggest threat.
JAY-EMMANUEL THOMAS 6: Big chance at 2-0 down but couldn’t react in time to divert ball home. Lonely shift up top.
SUBSTITUTES
JOSHUA MULLIN (for Ambrose, 45’) 6: Gave Livi a real threat down the right after coming on at the break.
ALAN FORREST (for Sibbald, 67’) 4: Couldn’t provide a spark to get Livi back into the game.
MATEJ POPLATNIK (for Emmanuel-Thomas, 86’) 3: On for last few minutes, but no chance to affect the game.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here