THE manager of the Romanian national team, Mirel Radoi, has leapt to the defence of Rangers midfielder Ianis Hagi after the 21-year-old's recent international displays were criticised in his homeland.
Hagi played in his country's 1-1 draw with Northern Ireland over the international break, with the playmaker being substituted around 10 minutes into the second half and was left on the bench for Romania's 3-2 away victory in Austria a few days later.
The midfielder's display against Ian Baraclough's men led to Hagi's international performances being put under the microscope back home, but Radoi has insisted he has "total confidence" in the player, adding that Hagi has often played out of position for the national team and that he had to be brought off against Northern Ireland as he had been booked.
He told Romanian news outlet Digisport: "We know who Gheorghe Hagi was and we expect Ianis to be the same.
READ MORE: The Steven Gerrard tactical tweak that's getting the most out of Ianis Hagi at Rangers
"After the first game [against Northern Ireland], he got a yellow card. He made two fouls and at one point the fourth official looked at me. I interpreted it as a sign that it would be good to take him off.
"Then with Austria, two changes were caused by injuries, and the tactical plan had to be changed. I don't think it is Ianis' faut that we did not beat Northern Ireland.
"Ianis is an important player of the national team. In his last game for Rangers, even after this pressure, he went very relaxed, he played very well and he was one of the people who decided the victory.
"In Ianis' 11 games now [for Romania], he has only played through the middle maybe once. He played in a 4-3-3, both wide left and wide right.
"We cannot accuse him of playing only number 10 and not delivering any assists. I see him as a number 10 and that's why I used him in the first game like that."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here